Re: [geos-devel] Re: New strategy for GEOS interruptability

2012-05-25 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 25 May 2012 16:32, Sandro Santilli wrote: > My only concern is portability of the code installing the signal > handler. In terms of standards, C89 does specifie signal.h with raise() and SIGINT signal number, so we should be fine. But, it needs testing. > Anyone up for testing this on MacOS a

[geos-devel] Re: New strategy for GEOS interruptability

2012-05-25 Thread Sandro Santilli
After more and more testing I find the experiemental approach actually pretty effective. So much that I'm wondering why not using it straight away in GEOS-3.3.4 (to be shipped shortly, coupled with PostGIS-2.0.1). By requiring NO change in the GEOS-C-API interface (as long as the SIGINT handler is