Re: [geos-devel] Re: cmake maintainance and distribution

2011-05-19 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 18/05/11 17:38, Sandro Santilli wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 09:54:29PM -0500, William Kyngesburye wrote: >> On May 17, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > ... >>> I aim to maintain CMake configuration. >>> Is this enough to fix 441 for now? >> >> I have a patch for an option to genera

Re: [geos-devel] Re: cmake maintainance and distribution

2011-05-18 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 09:54:29PM -0500, William Kyngesburye wrote: > On May 17, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: ... > > I aim to maintain CMake configuration. > > Is this enough to fix 441 for now? > > I have a patch for an option to generate an OS X framework. > I was hoping to see thi

Re: [geos-devel] Re: cmake maintainance and distribution

2011-05-17 Thread William Kyngesburye
On May 17, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > On 17/05/11 17:48, Sandro Santilli wrote: >> It was noted in ticket [441] that CMake build scripts >> are not being distributed. >> >> Now, before distributing them I'd like to know if someone >> is willing to maintain them, and in that case I

Re: [geos-devel] Re: cmake maintainance and distribution

2011-05-17 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 07:47:01PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > On 17/05/11 17:48, Sandro Santilli wrote: > > It was noted in ticket [441] that CMake build scripts > > are not being distributed. > > > > Now, before distributing them I'd like to know if someone > > is willing to maintain them, an

[geos-devel] Re: cmake maintainance and distribution

2011-05-17 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 17/05/11 17:48, Sandro Santilli wrote: > It was noted in ticket [441] that CMake build scripts > are not being distributed. > > Now, before distributing them I'd like to know if someone > is willing to maintain them, and in that case I'd ask this > someone to proceed at fixing the distribution