Re: [Geoserver-devel] Restored xslt to release profile

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 4:55 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies < ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote: > Andrea, > > when you promoted the inspire module to extension, it looks like you > inadvertently removed the xslt module from the release profile, on both > master and 2.3.x. I took the liberty of restoring

[Geoserver-devel] [Hudson] Hudson build is back to normal : cite-wms-1.3 #812

See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ -- AlienVault Unified Security Management (US

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] (GEOS-5814) Restarting geoserver makes teradata not fetch its tables

Hassam Ha

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Draft GSIP 95: Adding BBOX and SRS parameters to GetLegendGraphics

It is more that give BBOX and width/height we can calculate SCALE. So my comment was what to do if the user supplies both, and my answer was trust the user supplied SCALE (even if it is "wrong") as they probably know what they are doing. Note: SCALE exists now (you can use it in your exampl

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [ExternalEmail] Do not commit to 2.3.x: release fixing in progress

Looks like a good release. 2.3.x now open for commits. On 16/05/13 09:46, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Please do not commit to 2.3.x until I have fixed a small release > assembly problem. > > Yes, we should no longer have a code freeze; this would be true if we > had a Hudson geoserver-release-cite

[Geoserver-devel] Smoke testing GeoServer 2.3.2 release artifacts

All testers welcome: http://gridlock.opengeo.org/geoserver/release/2.3.2/ -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineer CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre -- AlienVault Unified S

[Geoserver-devel] Restored xslt to release profile

Andrea, when you promoted the inspire module to extension, it looks like you inadvertently removed the xslt module from the release profile, on both master and 2.3.x. I took the liberty of restoring xslt to the release profile on master and 2.3.x; please let me know if I have misunderstood! It

[Geoserver-devel] Do not commit to 2.3.x: release fixing in progress

Please do not commit to 2.3.x until I have fixed a small release assembly problem. Yes, we should no longer have a code freeze; this would be true if we had a Hudson geoserver-release-cite job that takes parameters (but Justin is busy enough as it is), and I do not want to have to rerun the ci

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Draft GSIP 95: Adding BBOX and SRS parameters to GetLegendGraphics

If both the SCALE and BBOX information is provided ... think we better use the provided SCALE? (i.e. the user is asking a specific question "show me a legend at this scale, but limit the feature content to the indicated area). So SCALE will tell you which rule to use in SLD but doesnt BBOX s

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Draft GSIP 95: Adding BBOX and SRS parameters to GetLegendGraphics

I had two fuzzy areas… and a question? 1) BBOX check … Think I am echoing Andrea's thought - if we can perform the bounding box check against the layer as a simple pass/fail then indeed it should work exactly the same for raster and vector layers. I understand your scope is limited to testing

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Is there any practical way to prioritize regressions?

> > Might not be what you wanted, but if you want other people to spend > effort, > it's good practice to show yours first. Andrea, like you I only have so much time as well and only so many things I can commit to. The other way to help I thought would be convincing my company to cough up mone

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Yes, Table Joining Service implementation

We also have some info about using git in our developer guide. http://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/developer/source.html On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Chris Holmes wrote: > Sounds great. The ideal thing to do to 'fork' the repo, see > https://help.github.com/articles/fork-a-repo > > So

Re: [Geoserver-devel] WMS reprojection error/question

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Eric Smets wrote: > > 1) http://129.206.228.72/osm-proxy/service? is de definition in the > store and the osm_auto:all > is used > > 2) The 900913 is working correctly on all the levels but the projection > 4326 is giving back detailed informatio > >From

[Geoserver-devel] [Hudson] Hudson build is back to normal : cite-wfs-1.1-master #833

See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ -- AlienVault Unified Security Managem

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Geoserver 2.3.2 release this week

I have a good set of GT/GS revisions with working CITE tests, so feel free to go back to breaking things on 2.3.x. :-) On 14/05/13 09:23, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > I will be releasing GeoServer 2.3.2 this week. Please refrain from > committing to the 2.3.x branch until the release is complete.