Re: [Geoserver-devel] Some funny discovery about time parsing: no more than 100 times!

2018-04-26 Thread Andrea Aime
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 3:29 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Andrea, > > that definitely qualifies as a bug fix. An exception is much preferred > over silent truncation. > > - Can the limit be made discoverable? > You mean in the capabilities? As far as I know there is no way

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [Geotools-devel] Mass source code reformat: when?

2018-04-26 Thread Jody Garnett
Completely understand, we will try and review all PRs generated tomorrow. On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 12:39 AM Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Jody, > sorry, I need a free weekend to do that, yesterday was holiday in Italy, > but also a bad day to do it family wise. > I also

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Mass source code reformat: when?

2018-04-26 Thread Andrea Aime
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:00 PM, Torben Barsballe < tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > One upcoming inconvenience I can see is that the monthly bug stomp is > planned for this Friday, which tends to generate some number of PRs. > Indeed, can we concentrate on cross reviewing them so that they

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [Geotools-devel] Mass source code reformat: when?

2018-04-26 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi Jody, sorry, I need a free weekend to do that, yesterday was holiday in Italy, but also a bad day to do it family wise. I also happen to know there are things in flight in GeoSolutions, but I'll let Daniele chime in about them Cheers Andrea On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:24 PM, Jody Garnett

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [Geotools-devel] Mass source code reformat: when?

2018-04-26 Thread Ian Turton
I'd be happy to go now, the branches I have open are going to be a while coming home and a reformat will be no hardship. Ian On 25 April 2018 at 09:10, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > the proposal is not getting any more votes, so I guess it can be > considered

Re: [Geoserver-devel] The REST based OGC services conundrum: is Spring MVC actually applicable?

2018-04-26 Thread Andrea Aime
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 7:05 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Thanks for this discussion/background Andrea. > > While I can think of bad ways to fake an interceptor kind of workflow > (give each request a scratch area to work with, call all the interceptors > and let them