On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 3:29 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
wrote:
> Andrea,
>
> that definitely qualifies as a bug fix. An exception is much preferred
> over silent truncation.
>
> - Can the limit be made discoverable?
>
You mean in the capabilities? As far as I know there is no way
Completely understand, we will try and review all PRs generated tomorrow.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 12:39 AM Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi Jody,
> sorry, I need a free weekend to do that, yesterday was holiday in Italy,
> but also a bad day to do it family wise.
> I also
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:00 PM, Torben Barsballe <
tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote:
> One upcoming inconvenience I can see is that the monthly bug stomp is
> planned for this Friday, which tends to generate some number of PRs.
>
Indeed, can we concentrate on cross reviewing them so that they
Hi Jody,
sorry, I need a free weekend to do that, yesterday was holiday in Italy,
but also a bad day to do it family wise.
I also happen to know there are things in flight in GeoSolutions, but I'll
let Daniele chime in about them
Cheers
Andrea
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:24 PM, Jody Garnett
I'd be happy to go now, the branches I have open are going to be a while
coming home and a reformat will be no hardship.
Ian
On 25 April 2018 at 09:10, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
> the proposal is not getting any more votes, so I guess it can be
> considered
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 7:05 AM, Jody Garnett
wrote:
> Thanks for this discussion/background Andrea.
>
> While I can think of bad ways to fake an interceptor kind of workflow
> (give each request a scratch area to work with, call all the interceptors
> and let them