It's time to put together the State of GeoServer and State of
GeoWebCache presentations for FOSS4G North America in two weeks.
If you have any improvements you want highlighted, clients who funded
work whom you want to thank, work underway that will be in upcoming
releases, or just anything you th
Title: Message Title
kiorky created an iss
Title: Message Title
Nuno Oliveira created
Title: Message Title
Nuno Oliveira created
Thank you Torben !
On 04/24/2018 10:23 PM, Torben Barsballe wrote:
Hi Nuno,
For GeoServer, you'll want to modify the release layout template for all versions that this
effects, e.g.:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver.github.io/blob/master/_layouts/release_213.html#L193
Given that we do
Thanks for the review Jody.
On 04/25/2018 12:13 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
(noticed test coverage of 68% was in the original email)
--
Jody Garnett
On 24 April 2018 at 16:12, Jody Garnett mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
Made a small review of the geotools PR (amounts to we have a do
Title: Message Title
Nathan Schulte create
Andrea,
I agree it’s a bug fix, but the reason we differentiate is mostly about
stability. Maybe leave it a bit longer than a bug-fix backport and not as long
as a feature release? Where it is on the scale is subjective, and I’m sure you
can make that judgement better than any of us.
Bra
I'm not seeing this.
I've tried a LG in both Single and Named Tree modes making get
capabilities requests to both services in the virtual service as well as
the group, and a layer both with and without its workspace prefix.
After doing a careful step though I got the virtual service capabilities
Title: Message Title
Andrea Aime created a
Title: Message Title
Sorin RUSU created an
11 matches
Mail list logo
