Justin Deoliveira (
https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?accountId=557058%3Abf34147d-5afe-4819-a12e-2d248b4c0a47
) *created* an issue
GeoServer (
https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiZWI0M2RmMWEzZGJlNDBiZTllNDFkMWIwY2Q2MWM5YTkiLCJwIjoiaiJ9
) / Bug (
GeoTools / GeoServer PMC meeting - 2022-01-18Attending
-
Torben Barsballe
-
Jukka Rahkonnen
-
Jody Garnet
-
Andrea Aime
-
Kevin Smith
Actions from prior meetings:
-
Andrea to follow up with spotless team to see how formatter handles
switching between
Based on today's meeting: I would like to propose GSIP-167
I will attach a quote for 5k to the above page; suggest remaining funds go
to cite code sprint.
--
Jody Garnett
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 13:42, Jody Garnett wrote:
> I double checked what was needed for log4j update, and updated the
> pr
Thanks! (no code changes expected indeed, I did run a reformat before
pushing the branch).
Cheers
Andrea
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 12:42 PM Roar Brænden
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried it on Mac OSX. No issues and no code changes.
>
> mvn -v
> *Apache Maven 3.8.4 (9b656c72d54e5bacbed989b64718c159fe39b537
Thanks folks!
You bet, happy to submit a PR, just wanted to confirm that it's not
intended behaviour before proceeding. Stay tuned.
On Tue., Feb. 1, 2022, 1:17 a.m. Andrea Aime, <
andrea.a...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 6:06 PM Justin Deoliveira
> wrote:
>
>> Howdy f
Hi,
I tried it on Mac OSX. No issues and no code changes.
mvn -v
Apache Maven 3.8.4 (9b656c72d54e5bacbed989b64718c159fe39b537)
Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.8.4/libexec
Java version: 1.8.0_171, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime:
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 1:20 AM Brad Hards wrote:
> On Sunday, 30 January 2022 5:02:31 AM AEDT Andrea Aime wrote:
> > mvn spotless:apply -nsu -Dall
>
> I tried it on linux. This command works OK, unsurprisingly.
>
> Looks like there were a couple of spots you missed in dealing with the old
> cov
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 6:06 PM Justin Deoliveira
wrote:
> Howdy folks,
>
Hey Justin, nice to hear from you!
> I guess my ultimate question is whether this is desirable behavior? I am
> thinking an abstract referencing "Layer-Group" in the cases where it's not
> a layer group is perhaps an ove
