Sorry for my late +1 here, enhancing security is never a mistake :-)
Cheers
Christian
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Justin Deoliveira <
> jdeol...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the late reply on this one. I think the proposed sol
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply on this one. I think the proposed solution of
> splitting the ui for geofence out into a separate repo in the geoserver org
> is fine.
>
Sounds like we have a consensus. Ok, I'll create a geofence repository
para
n Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Thought I gave you a +1 in the meeting.
>
Yep, you did, but not sure everybody else noticed, I was waiting for
something "official"
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more in
Sorry for the late reply on this one. I think the proposed solution of
splitting the ui for geofence out into a separate repo in the geoserver org
is fine.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Rahkonen Jukka (Tike) <
jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi> wrote:
> +1 for having a possibility to enjoy about those
Thought I gave you a +1 in the meeting.
It will be great to have an example of using area I interest for security since
we went to such effort to establish an API.
> On Oct 1, 2014, at 6:16 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
>
> Hi,
> any core developer interested in this one?
> Need a +1, or even a
+1 for having a possibility to enjoy about those advanced access control
features.
±0 for the implementation details. The easier to install and manage the better.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Andrea Aime wrote:
Hi,
any core developer interested in this one?
Need a +1, or even a -1, if you have concerns dis
Ciao Andrea,
I was waiting for someone else feedback, but I would go for leaving
the geofence code as a separate project under the GeoServer
organziation for the moment while having the probe (the custom
ResourceAccessManager implementation ) as a community module of
GeoServer.
I guess this is a +
Hi,
any core developer interested in this one?
Need a +1, or even a -1, if you have concerns discussing them would allow
us to see if they can be addressed somehow.
Cheers
Andrea
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> since the last thread started revolving around the name
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 08:17:53 AM Andrea Aime wrote:
> The code consists of a ResourceAccessManager implementation that talks to a
> GeoFence server, which evaluates access requests and sends back
> "entiltements",
> that is, what the user can do in terms of request access and so on.
> The GeoFence w
Hi,
since the last thread started revolving around the name mistake instead of
the
actual content of the mail, let me start again and let's gather some
feedback
about the actual module., shall we? ;-)
in the last years GeoSolutions has been working on a "advanced security
subsystem"
known as GeoFe
10 matches
Mail list logo