Hi all,
if anybody is interested in reviewing, the work is done and the pull
request is here:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/936
The changes to WPS are minimal, the old extension/ogr has become
extension/ogr/ogr-wfs
and there is a new extension/ogr/ogr-wps that uses the same code as
+0
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Phil Scadden wrote:
> +0 from me. I dont think I can comment usefully on this detail and user
> implications seem a little remote.
--
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashbur
Yeah thanks for the feedback, I will keep wps-client as an unfunded dream.
No problem with the api change, added +1 to the page.
--
Jody Garnett
On 21 January 2015 at 10:12, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Jody Garnett
> wrote:
>
>> As for the proposal I like it, any c
+0 from me. I dont think I can comment usefully on this detail and user
implications seem a little remote.
Notice: This email and any attachments are confidential.
If received in error please destroy and immediately notify us.
Do not copy or disclose the contents.
--
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Jody Garnett
wrote:
> As for the proposal I like it, any chance of this interface living in
> GeoTools level? Not that I will ever get WPS client funding...
>
I don't see it happening without funding... unless someone decides to crush
a good number of weekends o
As for the proposal I like it, any chance of this interface living in
GeoTools level? Not that I will ever get WPS client funding...
Alternate suggestion is to split this up into a read interface and a write
interface (with the same method names) - and then use those as marker
interfaces.
--
Jody
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Jody Garnett
wrote:
> It is okay Andrea, it was just a question about proposal for new extension
> points (since I have not been in day to day geoserver for a while). If we
> can handle it via email that is fine :)
>
Cool, either work for me.
If anyone has feedba
It is okay Andrea, it was just a question about proposal for new extension
points (since I have not been in day to day geoserver for a while). If we
can handle it via email that is fine :)
--
Jody
--
Jody Garnett
On 21 January 2015 at 01:47, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi all,
> here is a proposal f
Hi all,
here is a proposal for the 2.8.x series:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-126---Runtime-ProcessParameterIO-creation
The proposal implementation will be quite simple and non invasive, so we'll
want to propose
a backport to the 2.7.x series once the dust settles around the 2
