Of course there is nothing wrong with an exciting sprint either - indeed
easier to attract sponsorship and contributors.
If I can remind everyone to check availability for next year, would like to
confirm expectations so we can provide a budget request to OSGeo.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 5:20 AM
Yes this does sound like a very "code sprint" kind of thing. Quite a
bit of work for something that will help maintenance in the long run and
decidedly "boring" so there's little likelihood that it would get funded
otherwise.
On 2017-11-19 12:45 PM, Ian Turton wrote:
> That would be good for me
That would be good for me too.
Ian
On 19 Nov 2017 13:59, "Andrea Aime" wrote:
> Hey,
> just sharing another possibility for a code sprint that involves all
> projects, GeoTools, GeoServer, GWC:
>
>- Mass reformat all code in all active branches
>- Pick a
Hey,
just sharing another possibility for a code sprint that involves all
projects, GeoTools, GeoServer, GWC:
- Mass reformat all code in all active branches
- Pick a static analysis tool and fix any issue found
- Integrate said tool in the build (as its own goal) or as a github pull
The OGC renewal deadline has moved to end of this month, since we are
waiting a bug fix in the CITE testing application for GDAL.
Cheers,
Angelos
On 11/14/2017 07:56 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
GeoTools / GeoWebcache / GeoServer Meeting 2017-11-14
Attending
Jody Garnett
Andrea Aime
Jukka
GeoTools / GeoWebcache / GeoServer Meeting 2017-11-14
Attending
Jody Garnett
Andrea Aime
Jukka Rahkonen
Ian Turton
Torben Barsballe
Actions from Last Meeting
-
Jody/Torben: (done) Schedule CITE debugging session
-
Jody: (done) Remind GeoTools PMC to vote on Java 9 Proposal