Some notes from looking into the jetty upgrade.
Our present structure is:
*bin/*shutdown.sh
*bin/*shutdown.bat
*bin/*startup.sh
*bin/*startup.bat
*data_dir/*
*etc/* - mostly jetty configuration details like jetty-http.xml
*lib/ *- jetty jars
*license/*
*logs/*
*modules/*
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Jody Garnett
wrote:
> So review completed, merge when ready. Unless anyone else wants a crack at
> it ...
I'd say... merge :-p
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/it488V for more
We are running GeoServer 2.7.2 on Jetty 9.2 and Java 8 in a production
capacity, so far without issue (RHEL 6.6).
Just thought I'd throw that in there.
Jason Newmoyer
Newmoyer Geospatial Solutions
843.606.0424
ja...@newmoyergeospatial.com
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Justin Deoliveira
So review completed, merge when ready. Unless anyone else wants a crack at
it ...
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:12 AM Jason Newmoyer
wrote:
> We are running GeoServer 2.7.2 on Jetty 9.2 and Java 8 in a production
> capacity, so far without issue (RHEL 6.6).
>
> Just
Thanks for the review guys. Pull request merged. I’ll keep an eye out for
any unexpected issues that pop up.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Jody Garnett
> wrote:
>
>> So review
I did, as it was there before. So I just updated the copy. That said we
could probably change that and depend on it as a maven artifact. That is
what the mac installer does. It just requires we make some updates to the
assembly scripts. If you feel strongly about that I suggest we open up a
Thanks Justin, quick review left me with one question. Not sure if you
intended to commit src/release/jetty/start.jar as a binary file.
--
Jody Garnett
On 26 October 2015 at 11:23, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Pull request ready.
>
>
Hey folks,
Pull request ready.
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/1301
I’ve updated and tested the mac/win/bin installers. Also took the war for a
spin just for the sake of it and no issues there.
-Justin
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Justin Deoliveira
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:55 AM, Justin Deoliveira
wrote:
> Since it seems like now is a good time for upgrades how do people feel
> about a jetty upgrade? The 6.x version we are using is far past
> unmaintained at this point. I was thinking if we can jump straight to
>
Ares has a java 8 VM in place, if we would like to change master over.
Right now we have two experiments in place:
- master building direct against artifactoryonline
- stable and maintenance building against a proxy (that has been given
sufficient bandwidth)
Ares shows both have similar build
Hi,
I made a test and I could run Geoserver 2.8 on Jetty 9.3.3 on Windows.
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Re-Geoserver-devel-changing-data-directory-using-geoserver-war-with-jetty-td5230039.html
I also asked in another mail about how could I help with updating the Jetty
version that we
Thanks Justin, epic work pulling all the threads together.
I need to catch up on what is needed where - can I confirm your work is not
blocked on anything?
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 3:40 PM Justin Deoliveira
wrote:
> Great, thanks for the info guys. Good to know Jukka has had
Thanks Jody. Nope, I’m not blocked on anything, as soon as I verify that
there are no issues with the other release artifacts I’ll submit the pull
request for review.
I decided not to make this change contingent on the java 8 upgrade.
Although once the upgrade happens if we want to jump to jetty
Great, thanks for the info guys. Good to know Jukka has had success. At the
moment I’ve been working on updating the build time dependency, since as
you know we have a bunch of test scoped dependencies on jetty, and we
depend on it to build the release artifacts.
The first hitch I hit was the
Since it seems like now is a good time for upgrades how do people feel
about a jetty upgrade? The 6.x version we are using is far past
unmaintained at this point. I was thinking if we can jump straight to
version 9? It looks like 9.3+ requires java 8 so I was going to see how it
looked upgrading
We are set to update to Java 8 if you want to go higher.
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 5:57 PM Justin Deoliveira
wrote:
> Since it seems like now is a good time for upgrades how do people feel
> about a jetty upgrade? The 6.x version we are using is far past
> unmaintained at this
16 matches
Mail list logo