Re: [Geoserver-devel] LayergroupInfo changes

2015-11-08 Thread Andrea Aime
And probably this one too: https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-5888 Cheers Andrea On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Niels, > I believe that this ticket may have to be updated once you merge your work: >

Re: [Geoserver-devel] LayergroupInfo changes

2015-11-08 Thread Phil Scadden
+1. Looks a like a logical way to go. I can understand the motiviation. Notice: This email and any attachments are confidential. If received in error please destroy and immediately notify us. Do not copy or disclose the contents.

Re: [Geoserver-devel] LayergroupInfo changes

2015-11-08 Thread Christian Mueller
+1 from my side, makes sense Cheers Christian On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Niels, > I believe that this ticket may have to be updated once you merge your work: > https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-5040 > > Cheers > Andrea > > >

Re: [Geoserver-devel] LayergroupInfo changes

2015-11-07 Thread Jody Garnett
If you go to the wiki home page it has an link to template , and includes an example right there for you to cut and paste. -- Jody Garnett On 7 November 2015 at 11:50, Niels Charlier wrote: > Jody, > > Where's the template? I copy

Re: [Geoserver-devel] LayergroupInfo changes

2015-11-07 Thread Niels Charlier
Jody, Where's the template? I copy pasted the titles from the most recent proposal. Regards Niels On 11/06/2015 05:06 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: I updated the page with +1, but your proposal may of used the old template? -- Jody Garnett On 6 November 2015 at 11:46, Niels Charlier

Re: [Geoserver-devel] LayergroupInfo changes

2015-11-07 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi Niels, I believe that this ticket may have to be updated once you merge your work: https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-5040 Cheers Andrea On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Niels, > had a quick read, all seems perfectly

Re: [Geoserver-devel] LayergroupInfo changes

2015-11-06 Thread Niels Charlier
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-135 Let me know what you think. Kind Regards Niels On 27-10-15 19:09, Jody Garnett wrote: Yeah okay I like that. I had a proposal a while back to organize our pages with consistent headings (like GetCapabilities for all the title, abstract,

Re: [Geoserver-devel] LayergroupInfo changes

2015-11-06 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
+1 -Jukka Rahkonen- Niels Charlier wrote: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-135 Let me know what you think. Kind Regards Niels On 27-10-15 19:09, Jody Garnett wrote: Yeah okay I like that. I had a proposal a while back to organize our pages with consistent headings (like

Re: [Geoserver-devel] LayergroupInfo changes

2015-11-06 Thread Jody Garnett
I updated the page with +1, but your proposal may of used the old template? -- Jody Garnett On 6 November 2015 at 11:46, Niels Charlier wrote: > https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-135 > > Let me know what you think. > > Kind Regards > Niels > > > On 27-10-15

Re: [Geoserver-devel] LayergroupInfo changes

2015-11-06 Thread Simone Giannecchini
+0 Regards, Simone Giannecchini == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Simone Giannecchini @simogeo Founder/Director GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax:

Re: [Geoserver-devel] LayergroupInfo changes

2015-11-06 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
+0. No objection. On 06/11/15 23:46, Niels Charlier wrote: > https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-135 > > Let me know what you think. > > Kind Regards > Niels > > On 27-10-15 19:09, Jody Garnett wrote: >> Yeah okay I like that. >> >> I had a proposal a while back to organize our pages

Re: [Geoserver-devel] LayergroupInfo changes

2015-11-06 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi Niels, had a quick read, all seems perfectly reasonable, +1 Cheers Andrea On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Niels Charlier wrote: > https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-135 > > Let me know what you think. > > Kind Regards > Niels > > > On 27-10-15 19:09, Jody

[Geoserver-devel] LayergroupInfo changes

2015-10-27 Thread Niels Charlier
Hi, I want to propose some minor API changes for the catalog, will make a proper proposal but just wanted to check already if I can expect this to be an issue or not. 1. Move property [AttributionInfo attribution] from LayerInfo to PublishedInfo, so that Layergroups can have this as well. 2.

Re: [Geoserver-devel] LayergroupInfo changes

2015-10-27 Thread Andrea Aime
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Good point Andrea, I wonder if it is worth making seperate pages for the > different kinds of layer group? Some of these options only make sense when > the layer group is named (and thus drawable) for example. > I

Re: [Geoserver-devel] LayergroupInfo changes

2015-10-27 Thread Jody Garnett
Yeah okay I like that. I had a proposal a while back to organize our pages with consistent headings (like GetCapabilities for all the title, abstract, metadataish stuff). For now I would follow what is done for a layer - or at least use the same tab tiles for consistency. -- Jody Garnett On 27

Re: [Geoserver-devel] LayergroupInfo changes

2015-10-27 Thread Andrea Aime
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Niels Charlier wrote: > Hi, > > I want to propose some minor API changes for the catalog, will make a > proper proposal but just wanted to check already if I can expect this to > be an issue or not. > > 1. Move property [AttributionInfo

Re: [Geoserver-devel] LayergroupInfo changes

2015-10-27 Thread Jody Garnett
There is an outstanding proposal that Kevin was putting together - that may be related. * https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-130 -- Jody Garnett On 27 October 2015 at 09:32, Niels Charlier wrote: > Hi, > > I want to propose some minor API changes for the

Re: [Geoserver-devel] LayergroupInfo changes

2015-10-27 Thread Jody Garnett
Good point Andrea, I wonder if it is worth making seperate pages for the different kinds of layer group? Some of these options only make sense when the layer group is named (and thus drawable) for example. -- Jody Garnett On 27 October 2015 at 10:44, Andrea Aime