Re: [Geoserver-devel] branch maintenance

2009-11-02 Thread Mark Leslie
Andrea Aime wrote: > Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >> Hi all, >> >> I wanted to send a quick email to just make sure everyone is on the same >> page with regard to branch maintenance. A the moment we have 3 branches: >> >> 1.7.x >> 2.0.x >> trunk >> >> It seems that 1.7.x is close to going into un

Re: [Geoserver-devel] branch maintenance

2009-11-02 Thread Andrea Aime
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > Hi all, > > I wanted to send a quick email to just make sure everyone is on the same > page with regard to branch maintenance. A the moment we have 3 branches: > > 1.7.x > 2.0.x > trunk > > It seems that 1.7.x is close to going into unmaintained mode? Or perhaps >

Re: [Geoserver-devel] branch maintenance

2009-11-02 Thread Gabriel Roldan
Justin Deoliveira wrote: > > As for 2.0.x. i just want to remind/confirm our policy is still that any > bug fixes and "stable improvements" that go into trunk also go into > 2.0.x? Looking over the commit logs I have seen a recent commit to trunk > without a corresponding commit to 2.0.x. So just

Re: [Geoserver-devel] branch maintenance

2009-11-02 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Justin: Had a good discussion about 1.7.x with Mark and Andrea. I would like to put one more 1.7.x out; but schedule it for 6 months from now in order to communicate that nobody should be planning for additional 1.7.x releases any time soon. Jody On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Justin Deolive

[Geoserver-devel] branch maintenance

2009-11-02 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi all, I wanted to send a quick email to just make sure everyone is on the same page with regard to branch maintenance. A the moment we have 3 branches: 1.7.x 2.0.x trunk It seems that 1.7.x is close to going into unmaintained mode? Or perhaps just fix super critical show stopper mode? Or are w