fair enough, good for me then.
Gabriel
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
>> Thanks Gabriel. I replied to the feedback.
>>
>> I don't have too strong a preference here about making the MetadataMap
>> a map or not. I would lean toward keeping it a map, but i could be
>> persuaded
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Thanks Gabriel. I replied to the feedback.
>
> I don't have too strong a preference here about making the MetadataMap a
> map or not. I would lean toward keeping it a map, but i could be
> persuaded the other way if your preference is a strong one?
>
> Anyways, m
Thanks Gabriel. I replied to the feedback.
I don't have too strong a preference here about making the MetadataMap a
map or not. I would lean toward keeping it a map, but i could be
persuaded the other way if your preference is a strong one?
Anyways, maybe Andrea can be a tie breaker.
Gabriel R
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> I have gone and implemented the map as based on this thread. I would
> love a review:
I've posted my feedback on the issue. Basically it looks good, I just
keep on thinking there's no need for MetadataMap to implementa
java.util.Map. Proposed change being it either ju
I have gone and implemented the map as based on this thread. I would
love a review:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3164
-Justin
Gabriel Roldan wrote:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Gabriel Roldan ha scritto:
>>> Andrea Aime wrote:
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> A fe
Thanks for your input guys, I think this is a really good idea. I will
come up with a patch soon for review.
-Justin
Gabriel Roldan wrote:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Gabriel Roldan ha scritto:
>>> Andrea Aime wrote:
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> A few issues have popp
Gabriel Roldan ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> A few issues have popped up recently related to how maps (in
>>> particular the metadata map for catalog objects) is
>>> persisted/depersisted. The latest issue revolves around someone
>>> trying
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> A few issues have popped up recently related to how maps (in particular
>> the metadata map for catalog objects) is persisted/depersisted. The
>> latest issue revolves around someone trying ot configure a feature type
>> via res
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Gabriel Roldan ha scritto:
>> Andrea Aime wrote:
>>> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
Hi all,
A few issues have popped up recently related to how maps (in
particular the metadata map for catalog objects) is
persisted/depersisted. The latest issue revolve
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> A few issues have popped up recently related to how maps (in particular
> the metadata map for catalog objects) is persisted/depersisted. The
> latest issue revolves around someone trying ot configure a feature type
> via rest.
>
> The issue is that
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> So I am wondering. What do people think about making it practice that
> whenever accessing data from a metadata map, that a converter be used.
> The downside of course is that we have to update a bunch of code, and
> its one more thing to remember. The upside is that t
Hi all,
A few issues have popped up recently related to how maps (in particular
the metadata map for catalog objects) is persisted/depersisted. The
latest issue revolves around someone trying ot configure a feature type
via rest.
The issue is that in an attempt to make xstream less verbose, i
12 matches
Mail list logo
