Re: [Geoserver-devel] Metadata URI instead of URL validation

2012-07-26 Thread Michael Romero
Yeah I can tackle this. I'm thinking the warning Gabriel mentioned but only if the field value is not a full URL and the proxy URL is not set. This would result in an inaccessible URL in the capabilities response. Michael On Jul 26, 2012, at 6:28 AM, "Justin Deoliveira" mailto:jdeol...@opengeo

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Metadata URI instead of URL validation

2012-07-26 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Nope, this makes sense. Actually the schema requires just a uri, not a url so it should be perfectly valid to do this. ANy interest in taking this one on Michael? On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Gabriel Roldan wrote: > I personally have no objection in relaxing the URL validation done in > the

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Metadata URI instead of URL validation

2012-07-25 Thread Gabriel Roldan
I personally have no objection in relaxing the URL validation done in the UI. What if instead of a hard validation that prevents submitting the form, we just show a small warning message when the metadata URL text field loses focus (i.e. perform the validation through an ajax call). disclaimer: so