Re: [Geoserver-devel] OGC Features to supported status

2024-08-01 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi Gabriel, thanks for following up, some feedback inline below. On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 5:45 PM Gabriel Roldan < gabriel.rol...@camptocamp.com> wrote: > * Defining and Implementing Service Metadata Independent of WFS > Configuration: > > Currently, the service metadata and configuration for th

Re: [Geoserver-devel] OGC Features to supported status

2024-07-30 Thread Jody Garnett
Thanks Gabe, I am going to tone down some of the requirements as I am still learning what is going on. - I am not sure if the WFS configuration needs to be completely independent. We have global WFS settings that are used for workspace WFS (even if the global service is turned off). So

Re: [Geoserver-devel] OGC Features to supported status

2024-07-30 Thread Gabriel Roldan
Hi All, I apologize for the slow response and thank you all for your detailed and valuable contributions to this thread. I am still waiting for funding confirmation, but I want to emphasize the importance of approaching this as a community-driven, collaborative effort. Once funding is secured, o

Re: [Geoserver-devel] OGC Features to supported status

2024-07-06 Thread Andrea Aime
Alexandre, indeed they did. At the same time, the existing OWS APIs have been around for such a long time, what is the meaning of "deprecating", besides a formal statement? That will have some effect on large, formal organisations, but the rest of the world will carry on unscathed. The worst they

Re: [Geoserver-devel] OGC Features to supported status

2024-07-06 Thread Alexandre Gacon
Regarding OGC web services vs OGC API, during the OGC presentation, the speaker mentioned that when they think that a given API is good enough, they will deprecate the matching OGC Web Service. Alexandre Le sam. 6 juil. 2024 à 09:29, Andrea Aime a écrit : > On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 9:27 AM Andre

Re: [Geoserver-devel] OGC Features to supported status

2024-07-05 Thread Andrea Aime
On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 9:27 AM Andrea Aime < andrea.a...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote: > And then basically rinse and repeat for the other services (for extra fun, > consider that today you cannot have WMS without WFS around, > due to GetFeatureInfo depending on GML outputs). > Mind, the above ref

Re: [Geoserver-devel] OGC Features to supported status

2024-07-05 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi all, sorry for the late reply, FOSS4G EU preparations kept me from following up on this one for a bit. Observations below. On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 9:41 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > *conformances* > > My customers really want fine grain control over the conformances; the > ability to enable/disa

Re: [Geoserver-devel] OGC Features to supported status

2024-06-24 Thread Jody Garnett
Sorry gabe, here is the correct PR: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/7716 showing some of the user interface integration challenges -- Jody Garnett On Jun 24, 2024 at 11:40:34 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Hi Gabe, > > GeoCat is interested in doing so also - so I really wish to be sure

Re: [Geoserver-devel] OGC Features to supported status

2024-06-24 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Gabe, GeoCat is interested in doing so also - so I really wish to be sure to communicate and not trip on each other. While Andrea has gone into some technical gotcha's I have some user experience challenges to go over also. Disclaimer that I respect the work done thus far; and many of the sur

Re: [Geoserver-devel] OGC Features to supported status

2024-06-24 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi Gabriel, as a goal, it is achievable, but there are a few roadblocks that need to be removed. On the good side of things, we have a service that, last time I checked, managed to pass the CITE tests for OGC API - Core and OGC API Features - Coordinate Reference Systems by Reference. However, the