Re: [Geoserver-devel] OSGEO request for incubation is a go

2009-07-01 Thread Jody Garnett
>> 18. If you do not intend to host any portion of this project using the >> OSGeo infrastructure, why should you be considered a member project of >> the OSGeo Foundation? >> >> Do we want to make use of any osgeo infrastructure? Or are we happy with >> what we have now? If anything I might think

Re: [Geoserver-devel] OSGEO request for incubation is a go

2009-07-01 Thread Andrea Aime
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > 13. Is the code free of patents, trademarks, and do you control the > copyright? > > Do we officially control the copyright? Or are contributor agreements > still coming in? On a related note the question of who should retain > copyright has been raised by Jody.

Re: [Geoserver-devel] OSGEO request for incubation is a go

2009-06-30 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > looking at the OSGEO thread it would seem all of the > current PSC members have voted positively: > > Andrea Aime: +1 > Alessio Fabiani: +1 > Chris Holmes: +1 > Jody Garnett: +1 > Justin Deoliveira: +1 > Rob Harnak: +1 > > The PSC has thus showed full will to go on with

Re: [Geoserver-devel] OSGEO request for incubation is a go

2009-06-30 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Aime ha scritto: > Hi, > looking at the OSGEO thread it would seem all of the > current PSC members have voted positively: > > Andrea Aime: +1 > Alessio Fabiani: +1 > Chris Holmes: +1 > Jody Garnett: +1 > Justin Deoliveira: +1 > Rob Harnak: +1 Duh... Rob Atkinson: +1 So excited that I did

Re: [Geoserver-devel] OSGEO request for incubation is a go

2009-06-30 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Aime ha scritto: > Hi, > looking at the OSGEO thread it would seem all of the > current PSC members have voted positively: > > Andrea Aime: +1 > Alessio Fabiani: +1 > Chris Holmes: +1 > Jody Garnett: +1 > Justin Deoliveira: +1 > Rob Harnak: +1 Erk, forgot about Simone, apologies :) Cheers