Re: [Geoserver-devel] Request IDs

2016-03-19 Thread Robert Coup
Hi Andrea, On 18 March 2016 at 10:22, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Robert, > sorry for the late reply, busy times, could not answer right away and then > lost it in the build > server failures storm that we have been into lately > No worries, I completely understand :) >>- Alter the Request cl

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Request IDs

2016-03-19 Thread Chris Snider
@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] Request IDs Hi Chris, On 18 March 2016 at 14:35, Chris Snider mailto:chris.sni...@issinc.com>> wrote: For our application stack, we use Zipkin with a backing Cassandra store in a Docker environment. This also uses a custom httpclient that is integrate

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Request IDs

2016-03-19 Thread Robert Coup
Hi Chris, On 18 March 2016 at 14:35, Chris Snider wrote: > > > For our application stack, we use Zipkin with a backing Cassandra store in > a Docker environment. This also uses a custom httpclient that is > integrated into the various levels of the app stack and service > implementations. Zipk

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Request IDs

2016-03-19 Thread Chris Snider
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] Request IDs On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Robert Coup mailto:robert.c...@koordinates.com>> wrote: One small extra note, it could also be useful to have also have the request id in the response header, so that if I have a problematic request in the client,

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Request IDs

2016-03-19 Thread Andrea Aime
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Robert Coup wrote: > One small extra note, it could also be useful to have also have the >> request id in the response header, so that >> if I have a problematic request in the client, I can go and look for the >> id and then grep the logs for just the log >> lin

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Request IDs

2016-03-18 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi Robert, sorry for the late reply, busy times, could not answer right away and then lost it in the build server failures storm that we have been into lately On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Robert Coup wrote: > Hi folks, > > Just exploring the best way to go about this. We use a X-Request-ID he