We could also go that way, but to make it work, we'd also need to stop
shipping the sample
data directory with GeoServer. Does not make sense to have a large-ish data
set embedded in the war
file when production environments just ship their own data.
One might say the Windows and the bin could con
I've been secretly wishing we shipped with a nicer default datadir for
years, something like ne indeed.
Maybe we can evaluate decoupling the data/ directory (data/release,
data/minimal, etc.) from the
codebase into its own repository and make the data/ directory a submodule
instead?
In that direct
Interesting, I did not know about this.
So I guess I am at least 0 on this proposal.
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
Online training classes for GeoNode, GeoServer and MapStore from the
experts!
Visit https://bookwhen.com/geosolutions-professional-training for more
information.
==
Ing. Simone Gia
This is indeed a fair point - however I believe the situation is the other
way around, I hope this alleviates criticism we already receive.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:57 PM Simone Giannecchini <
simone.giannecch...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote:
> Hi Jody,
> on the technical side I am neutral but
Hi Jody,
on the technical side I am neutral but on the more "marketing" side do we
really want to ship disputed areas?
I am concerned that we expose ourselves to criticism, unnecessarily.
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
Online training classes for GeoNode, GeoServer and MapStore from the
experts!
Checking, the platforms that we surely would not support in red:
[image: image.png]
[image: image.png]
All the others here only have some flavor of 64 bits:
[image: image.png]
Mind, I believe the sizes reported above are the uncompressed ones
Cheers
Andrea
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 1:30 PM Jod
(whoops, noticed that I answered only privately, sending to ml as well):
Geoserver is already at a stupid 110MB size... 3.5MB more is like a 3%
increase, not much
At the same time, this is exactly how it grows... Little by little over the
years.
So, I'd cast a "zero" vote on this.
I was looking