On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Andrea Aime
andrea.a...@geo-solutions.itwrote:
Hi,
following up today's meeting I've put together a quick proposal for the
machinery needed to fix http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-5370 :
+0 here ... although I understood the issue and the solution, it's not
fully clear to me if this is the optimal solution. It should work anyway.
A.
==
GeoServer training in Milan, 6th 7th June 2013! Visit
http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information.
==
Ing. Alessio Fabiani
@alfa7691
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au wrote:
+1. Good analysis of the problem.
My one concern is that this change might introduce some interesting new
thread-local leaks, either security or plain unanticipated thread
interactions. Would you consider
Hi,
following up today's meeting I've put together a quick proposal for the
machinery needed to fix http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-5370 :
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+96+-+Machinery+to+pass+thread+locals+down+in+thread+pools
Feedback and votes welcomed :-)
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
+0. While I am all for the bug being fixed, I dont think I can comment
usefully on the efficacy of the proposed solution.
Notice: This email and any attachments are confidential.
If received in error please destroy and immediately notify us.
Do not copy or disclose the contents.
Looks good to me. +1
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Phil Scadden p.scad...@gns.cri.nz wrote:
+0. While I am all for the bug being fixed, I dont think I can comment
usefully on the efficacy of the proposed solution.
Notice: This email and any attachments are confidential.
If received in
+1. Good analysis of the problem.
My one concern is that this change might introduce some interesting new
thread-local leaks, either security or plain unanticipated thread
interactions. Would you consider leaving this on master for a month
before backporting?
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 27/05/13
