On 26 January 2012 17:31, Andrea Aime andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Chenglin Gan chenglin@noaa.gov wrote:
2. If I have to go with quad-tree index, how can I generate one offline
before pushing the shapefile to GeoServer?
Hmm... we don't have a
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Rahkonen Jukka
jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fiwrote:
Hi,
Is the Geotools .qix using the same format than GDAL? If it is then there
are one or two more alternatives. GDAL comes often (but not always) with a
Mapserver utility shptree. And then it is possible to use
I should update the URL I am trying to hit:
http://localhost:8080/application context/customstyle.xml
_
Ivan Suftin - Applications Developer - isuf...@usgs.gov
Office: (608) 821-3825 - Cell : (608) 345-8963
Center for Integrated Data Analytics -
Hello everyone, I've been monitoring memory usage of my geoserver instance (2.1
snapshot, compiled about a month ago) running under tomcat. After 12-48 hours
or so the PS Old Gen memory pool fills up completely . At this point GC tends
to consume much more CPU resources when it runs and barely
Thanks Gabriel,
I uploaded screenshots of a report created by the 'Memory Analysis Tool'
Eclipse plugin, in case that might help: http://imgur.com/a/Apt6K
-Matt
From: Gabriel Roldán grol...@opengeo.orgmailto:grol...@opengeo.org
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:50:50 -0500
To: Matt Bertrand
Yes, the format is the same, but the .qix files generated by GeoServer
should be smaller and perform somewhat better
(we have a few heuristics to get a small but effective index, avoid
isolated laves with single records and the like).
A recent version of uDig will generate the same .qix file