Hi Ben,
Thank you for the reply. I switched to version 2.5.1 to check if a bug
in WCS was fixed, but it was not. So to avoid the problem asap in our
running applications I switched back to version 2.3.5 in which the
matchCase was accepted in fes:PropertyIsLike. Perhaps I will try the
next
Hi,
I've created an issue. Thanks for your responses.
Best regards,
Nhan
On 6/16/2014 4:40 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Rahkonen Jukka (Tike)
jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi mailto:jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi wrote:
Hi,
I did test with WCS 1.0.0 and the
PS: Sorry I mean Filter 2.0 :-)
On 6/17/2014 8:51 AM, Nhan Vo wrote:
Hi Ben,
Thank you for the reply. I switched to version 2.5.1 to check if a bug
in WCS was fixed, but it was not. So to avoid the problem asap in our
running applications I switched back to version 2.3.5 in which the
I use Geoserver for rendering Imagery and Vector data. I have a PostGIS
table with a numeric type which has NaN values. I am creating SLD for
this vector data and not sure how to setup ogc:Filter for this value. I
have tried the followings and they don't seem to work:
Below is the FeatureTypeStyle that draws polygon with labels. As you
can see from the attached image, the labels are repeated many times over the
polygon. Is there a VendorOption that I can use to suppress the behavior?
sld:FeatureTypeStyle
sld:Rule
NameLanding
Hi
My performance tests show that WMS requests in version 1.3 has been slower
in Geoserver 2.5.1
In Geoserver log i can see that PostGIS Select has different coordinates for
POLYGON in version 1.3 compared to 1.1.1.
any idea ?
From Geoserver log version 1.3
SELECT
Hi,
Just checking that the requests to the service were identical in both cases,
weren't they? Can we see one request as an example?
-Jukka Rahkonen-
perre wrote:
Hi
My performance tests show that WMS requests in version 1.3 has been slower in
Geoserver 2.5.1 In Geoserver log i can see
I notice that the IsEqualsToImpl does make allowances for NaN:
return (fp1 == fp2) || (Double.isNaN(fp1) Double.isNaN(fp2));
See
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/library/main/src/main/java/org/geotools/filter/IsEqualsToImpl.java#L126
However I cannot see any test case
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 1:22 PM, perre per.reinho...@metria.se wrote:
Hi
My performance tests show that WMS requests in version 1.3 has been slower
in Geoserver 2.5.1
Compared to what? Previous versions, 1.1.1 in the same version?
Anyways, no, nothing comes to mind.
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 1:58 PM, dperko dario.perko...@rgn.hr wrote:
I have OpenGeo Suite 4.02 with Geoserver 2.4, in Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1
Standard. I installed also Oracle JDK 7 with Public JRE included. For
production I have to add all parameters about server mode, memory etc in
few
Windows Server 2003 had a tradition of being difficult, not sure about 2008.
Have a look at http://boundlessgeo.com/solutions/opengeo-suite/ which
includes two weeks trial support.
--
Jody
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Andrea Aime andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it
wrote:
On Sun,
I was kind of hoping NaN would work - since it is supported by
Double.valueOf [1]
--
Jody
[1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10750975/parse-string-to-double-nan
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Andrea Aime andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:03 AM,
Hi Jeroen,
sorry for the delay. Could you provide us a sample data for replicating the
issue?
Best Regards,
Nicola Lagomarsini.
2014-06-14 10:42 GMT+02:00 Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.com:
You may wish to create a bug report for this one as it has been a couple
of days without a reply.
Hi Nicola,
thanks, but the problem is that it's a complex setup, which basically only
runs here internally. I would have to replicate the issue in a setup without
internal dependencies to give you something.
Also screenshots are not going to be very helpful since they are simply black.
I also
Keep in mind that if you call the WMS layer for tiles, you will probably get
repeated labels as well since each individual tile is requested independently
of the other tiles.
Chris Snider
Senior Software Engineer
Intelligent Software Solutions, Inc.
[Description: Description: Description:
Thanks for the reply. We recently upgraded from geoserver 2.2.4 to 2.5 and
noticed that the custom delegates are registered differently, and ours was not
getting picked up. Is there any other changes to custom delegates you know
about? We are looking into it.
Also do you know if the WFS
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Bessette-Halsema, Dominique E
dominique.besse...@gdit.com wrote:
Thanks for the reply. We recently upgraded from geoserver 2.2.4 to 2.5
and noticed that the custom delegates are registered differently, and ours
was not getting picked up. Is there any other
Hi all
We are currently upgrading our geoserver from 2.2.4 to 2.5. We registered our
new custom delegate in the gs-wcs-2.5.jar applicationContext.xml so spring can
pick them up. Now we are having issues accessing our delegate in our custom
WPS jar. I was just wondering if anyone had any
2.2 to 2.5 is a bit of a jump. We did some work on WPS annotations and such
like over that time period on the geotools side. You may also want to check
the upgrade instructions from GeoTools 8 onward:
http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/welcome/upgrade.html
Jody Garnett
On Wed, Jun
Dario,
you will have to do this for Jetty (or any other container), because that is
where the Java process is generated.
In response to Jody: Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 is fine, I just restarted my
geoserver server after 3972 hours (yep, bugger didn't get to 4000, but what
do you do if they turn
20 matches
Mail list logo
