Re: [Geoserver-users] Looking for suggestions on version control for configuration files

Hi Chris, I was in the same quest, and decided that combination of inotifywatch and etckeeper with custom directory would be the most simple solution on Linux if you don't have some plugin that uses H2 databases as configuration. You can have production data dir as origin repo. You can push

Re: [Geoserver-users] Looking for suggestions on version control for configuration files

Hi Chris, I was in the same quest, and decided that combination of inotifywatch and etckeeper with custom directory would be the most simple solution on Linux if you don't have some plugin that uses H2 databases as configuration. You can have production data dir as origin repo. You can push

Re: [Geoserver-users] 2.11.5 large rasters -> wms cause servlet instability, JVM settings?

Do you use ImagePyramid plugin? -- Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GeoServer-User-f3786390.html ___ Geoserver-users mailing list Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this list: - Earning your

[Geoserver-users] Geofence internal server IP rules

I have a question about Geofence internal server. As I can see in the geofence database, gf_rule table has ip_high, ip_low, ip_size columns. Is it a leftover from standalone geofence, or Geofence internal can also deal with ip limits? -- Sent from:

[Geoserver-users] WFS 2.0.0 stored query return feature type error

Hi guys, I'm stuck at creating stored query via CreateStoredQuery request. So the XML of a stored query definition is: http://www.opengis.net/wfs/2.0; xmlns:wfs="http://www.opengis.net/wfs/2.0; xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml/3.2; xmlns:fes="http://www.opengis.net/fes/2.0;

[Geoserver-users] Geoserver WFS default GetFeatureById stored query & INSPIRE

Is there any way to change the default hardcoded urn:ogc:def:query:OGC-WFS::GetFeatureById stored query so that it can be INSPIRE compliant: "Reqest DescribeStoreQueries and test that the DescribeStoredQueries response contains at least one StoredQueryDescription with the Parameters: 'CRS',

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver WFS - app-schema plugin - java.lang.StackOverflowErrors

Yes, I set maximum thread stack size for JAVA in JAVA_OPTS to -Xss4096K. -- Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GeoServer-User-f3786390.html -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's

[Geoserver-users] Geoserver WFS - app-schema plugin - java.lang.StackOverflowErrors

I'm using Geoserver 2.11.dev, app-schema plugin and getting java.lang.StackOverflowErrors when downloading more than cca 10 features through WFS 2.0.0. published from app-schema store (PostGIS backend): 19 pro 09:49:48 ERROR [geoserver.ows] - java.lang.StackOverflowError at

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.10 & external Geofence 3.2 - GetFeatureInfo problem

quot;Ian Turton [via OSGeo.org]" < > ml+s1560n5329680...@n6.nabble.com> wrote: > >> But in freemarker a feature's attributes are stored in a map so there is >> no expected order to them. If you require an order then you should define >> it. >> >> Ian >&

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.10 & external Geofence 3.2 - GetFeatureInfo problem

eature's attributes are stored in a map so there is > no expected order to them. If you require an order then you should define > it. > > Ian > > On 28 Jul 2017 18:44, "dracic" <[hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node=5329680=0>> wrote: > >

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.10 & external Geofence 3.2 - GetFeatureInfo problem

_NAME.value} has these characteristics: ${feature.PERSONS.value} $feature.MALE.value} $feature.EMPLOYED or what ever ordering you need. Ian On 28 July 2017 at 13:47, dracic <[hidden email] <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node=5329667=0>> wrote: > So with the previous template with no Geofence r

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.10 & external Geofence 3.2 - GetFeatureInfo problem

So with the previous template with no Geofence rule limiting attribute access, GetFeatureinfo request orders columns as they are listed in tabel or layer property. With Geofence rule, they have no particular order, and subsequent request can have even different order from previous requests. --

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.10 & external Geofence 3.2 - GetFeatureInfo problem

Sorry, those were default templates. This is my custom setup: -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Geoserver-2-10-external-Geofence-3-2-GetFeatureInfo-problem-tp5329591p5329630.html Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.10 & external Geofence 3.2 - GetFeatureInfo problem

I have tried with default templates and custom templates with the same result. When I say "order" I mean column order as in PostGIS table DDL or in Feature Type Details in Layer Properties. When you say "If you have not specified a freemarker template for the request then I do not expect there to

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.10 & external Geofence 3.2 - GetFeatureInfo problem

I have tried with default templates and custom templates with the same result. When I say "order" I mean column order as in PostGIS table DDL or in Feature Type Details in Layer Properties. When you say "If you have not specified a freemarker template for the request then I do not expect there to

[Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.10 & external Geofence 3.2 - GetFeatureInfo problem

Hi everyone I'm having strange problems with GetFeatureinfo requests when restricting access to some of layer attributes. After that column order in getfeaturinfo request results is messed up - reordered. I could see that following requests change that order again. This kind of rule order

Re: [Geoserver-users] Integrated gwc problem

Just to update you about the problem. I tried to disable direct integration with GeoServer WMS, with no success. Also when I try to reload GWC settings I get: Unknown or malformed request. Please try again, somtimes the form is not properly received. This frequently happens on the first POST

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.9.2 GC overhead limit exceeded

What Linux distribution do you use? -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Geoserver-2-9-2-GC-overhead-limit-exceeded-tp5306122p5316242.html Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[Geoserver-users] Integrated gwc problem

I have problem since I upgraded from 2.7.x to 2.10.x. The problem is similar to the one that supposed to be resolved: http://www.mail-archive.com/geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg09204.html I have

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.9.2 GC overhead limit exceeded

Limit of 1024 max open files is too low for GWC in heavy use. You should set it to unlimited. -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Geoserver-2-9-2-GC-overhead-limit-exceeded-tp5306122p5311451.html Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.9.2 GC overhead limit exceeded

I see now that you posted limits for root account. You should check for tomcat user, or account that is used for tomcat service. I don't see which distro you use... -- View this message in context:

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.9.2 GC overhead limit exceeded

Please send us output of the command: su - tomcat -c "ulimit -a" -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Geoserver-2-9-2-GC-overhead-limit-exceeded-tp5306122p5310552.html Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[Geoserver-users] Geoserver clustering - firewall rules

I was in some struggle to get things working with firewalld on CentOS 7 regarding firewall rules. I was omitting multicast discovery adresses. Things were pretty simple on CentOS 6: -A INPUT -m pkttype -j ACCEPT --pkt-type multicast in /etc/sysconfig/iptables With firewalld on CentOS 7 things

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver upgrade 2.7.x -> 2.8.x - styling changed

Yes, I updated the JAVA as suggested in docs. I used Oracle JDK 1.7.0_75 with Geoserver 2.7.x, and now with 2.8.x I use Oracle JDK 1.8.0_101. -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Geoserver-upgrade-2-7-x-2-8-x-styling-changed-tp5292221p5292235.html Sent from the

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver upgrade 2.7.x -> 2.8.x - styling changed

The minute I posted here, I found the solution. So i have to use "Nimbus Sans L Regular" insetad of "Nimbus Sans L". When I use "Nimbus Sans L" i get labels in "Nimbus Sans L Regular Condensed". -- View this message in context:

[Geoserver-users] Geoserver upgrade 2.7.x -> 2.8.x - styling changed

So i was testing upgrade from 2.7 to 2.8 and also possibly from 2.7 to 2.9, and noticed some changes in styles 2.7.x : 2.8.x and also 2.9.x There is a slight

Re: [Geoserver-users] WPS plugin wants to write to CATALINA_HOME

Mea culpa! I obviously did some vim ninjutsu unavarely. Just did: yum reinstall tomcat and the original /etc/tomcat/tomcat.conf doesn't have CATALINA_TMPDIR commented. -- View this message in context:

[Geoserver-users] JMS Clustering issues

Has anyone encountered issues with propagating some configuration settings with JMS Clustering plugin? There are some issues at Geoserver JIRA: https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-7263 https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-7268

Re: [Geoserver-users] WPS plugin wants to write to CATALINA_HOME

That was my firs thought, but as tomcat user has rights to write to CATALINA_HOME i thought that the problem could be something else... This is obviously Centos 7 Tomcat error. CATALINA_TMPDIR variable is by default commented in /etc/sysconfig/tomcat & /etc/tomcat/tomcat.conf, but startup script

[Geoserver-users] WPS plugin wants to write to CATALINA_HOME

I'm testing Geoserver 2.9.1 on CentOS7, Oracle JDK 1.8u101 and Tomcat7, and getting an error in geoserver log: 2016-09-07 12:39:18,706 ERROR [wps.gs] - Unable to configure some of the GeorectifyCoverage process properties. java.io.IOException: Unable to write on the specified folder:

Re: [Geoserver-users] GeoServer 2.8.3 released

Andrea, reading https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-7392. So this is backported from 2.8.3 to geoserver 2.7 nightly builds, or there will be a 2.7.7 release? Thanks Davor -- View this message in context:

[Geoserver-users] Geoserver high CPU user time after startup

I use CentOS 6, Oracle JRE 1.7.0.75, Tomcat 7, Geoserver 2.7.5, and have JVM settings according to "Running in a Production Environment": JAVA_OPTS="${JAVA_OPTS} -server -Djava.awt.headless=true" JAVA_OPTS="${JAVA_OPTS} -Xms2048m -Xmx2048m -XX:NewRatio=2 -XX:PermSize=256m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m

Re: [Geoserver-users] Possible bug rendering postgis data?

geowolf wrote > It's actually a postgis data store option, and can be disabled I haven't see that in GUI, so i suppose through JAVA_OPTS? Like this: -Dorg.geotools.data.postgis.setSimplifyEnabled=false -- View this message in context:

Re: [Geoserver-users] Possible bug rendering postgis data?

As I'm aware, Geoserver uses ST_Simplify in WMS rendering. So you should do se your PostgreSQL logs, and see how the query actually looks, and then do geometry validation with that data. Perhaps small lines are collapsing to points https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/2093

Re: [Geoserver-users] JNS Clustering not updating Layer Groups

warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or > completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes > made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of > e-mail transmission, viruses, etc. > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:15 PM, dracic &g

Re: [Geoserver-users] JNS Clustering not updating Layer Groups

I can confirm the same issue, with the same setup. I also noticed that Workspace/General WMS settings are not propagated to slaves. I haven't tested WFS/WCS settings. -- View this message in context:

Re: [Geoserver-users] GeoServer stop working after some times

Can you paste tomcat log? -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GeoServer-stop-working-after-some-times-tp5230993p5231992.html Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.7.2 raster reprojection to wgs84 - strange behavior

I forgot to mention that I use Oracle JRE 1.7.0_71, Tomcat 7 on CentOS6, native JAI and TurboJPEG, -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Geoserver-2-7-2-raster-reprojection-to-wgs84-strange-behavior-tp5229798p5229800.html Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing

[Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.7.2 raster reprojection to wgs84 - strange behavior

Hello everyone, i noticed some strange behavior today with rasters served through WMS (ImagePyramid layer) stored in EPSG:3765 - HTRS96 Croatia TM but requested with WGS84 on client side. As EPSG:3765 is incorporated into ArcGIS since 10.x version, the only supported SRS for the layer in 9.3 is