Hello,

using geoserver 2.10.0, 2.12.2 with the ImageMosaicJDBC plugin and set 
interpolation method to bicubic in the ImageMosaicJDBC configFile the 
background isn't clear (see screenshot bicubic.jpg ).
If I set the interpolation method to bilinear in the imageMosaicJDBC config 
file, the background is fine (see screenshot bilinear.jpg ).

Our rasterdata are 4 band tiff files, store in a oracle database.

If this a problem of the bicubic interpolation or can we handle it with 
configuration,  or is it a bug in the ImageMosaicJDBC plugin?
Any Ideas?

best regards,
Sebastian


Tomcat 8.0.41
Java 1.8.0_111
Linux and Windows
tested with geoserver 2.10.0, 2.12.2


ImageMosaicJDBC configFile:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE ImageMosaicJDBCConfig [
  <!ENTITY mapping PUBLIC "mapping"  "./oracle.mapping.xml.inc">
  <!ENTITY connect PUBLIC "connect"  "./oracle.connect.xml.inc">]>
<config version="1.0">
  <coverageName name="DOPRGBI20"/>
  <coordsys name="EPSG:4647"/>
  <!-- interpolation 1 = nearest neighbour, 2 = bilinear, 3 = bicubic -->
  <scaleop  interpolation="3"/>
  <verify cardinality="false"/>
  &mapping;
  &connect;
</config>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list

Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this 
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: 
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: 
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html

If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: 
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer


Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to