Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.10 & external Geofence 3.2 - GetFeatureInfo problem

On 30 July 2017 at 15:56, dracic wrote: > So when no ordering is present in freemarker template the normal behavior > is that Geoserver orders attributes randomly for each Getfeatureinfo > request? Is that what you are trying to tell me? > I'm saying that GeoServer and

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.10 & external Geofence 3.2 - GetFeatureInfo problem

Just to add one thing. The problem is not related only to html responses. The same issue is present with text, GML and GeoJSON responses. So my logic tells me that this has nothing to do with freemarker templates. It has to do with limiting attribute access through Geofence. Best regards Davor

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.10 & external Geofence 3.2 - GetFeatureInfo problem

So when no ordering is present in freemarker template the normal behavior is that Geoserver orders attributes randomly for each Getfeatureinfo request? Is that what you are trying to tell me? So my logic tells me that if this is the case, this would be the case with the default Geoserver

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.10 & external Geofence 3.2 - GetFeatureInfo problem

But in freemarker a feature's attributes are stored in a map so there is no expected order to them. If you require an order then you should define it. Ian On 28 Jul 2017 18:44, "dracic" wrote: > Ok. I think I'm not clear enough. I do not want any specific order. I >

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.10 & external Geofence 3.2 - GetFeatureInfo problem

Ok. I think I'm not clear enough. I do not want any specific order. I would like generic behavior - which is the one when Geofence rules don't apply and that is that the attributes are ordered in the way they are listed in database tables or in attribute list in geoserver layer properties. So that

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.10 & external Geofence 3.2 - GetFeatureInfo problem

So with the previous template with no Geofence rule limiting attribute access, GetFeatureinfo request orders columns as they are listed in tabel or layer property. With Geofence rule, they have no particular order, and subsequent request can have even different order from previous requests. --

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.10 & external Geofence 3.2 - GetFeatureInfo problem

Sorry, those were default templates. This is my custom setup: -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Geoserver-2-10-external-Geofence-3-2-GetFeatureInfo-problem-tp5329591p5329630.html Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.10 & external Geofence 3.2 - GetFeatureInfo problem

I have tried with default templates and custom templates with the same result. When I say "order" I mean column order as in PostGIS table DDL or in Feature Type Details in Layer Properties. When you say "If you have not specified a freemarker template for the request then I do not expect there to

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.10 & external Geofence 3.2 - GetFeatureInfo problem

I have tried with default templates and custom templates with the same result. When I say "order" I mean column order as in PostGIS table DDL or in Feature Type Details in Layer Properties. When you say "If you have not specified a freemarker template for the request then I do not expect there to

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.10 & external Geofence 3.2 - GetFeatureInfo problem

If you have not specified a freemarker template for the request then I do not expect there to be any specific attribute order implied in the getfeatureinfo specification. If you have to have a fixed order of some of the attributes then a freemarker template is probably the best way to go. Ian On

[Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.10 & external Geofence 3.2 - GetFeatureInfo problem

Hi everyone I'm having strange problems with GetFeatureinfo requests when restricting access to some of layer attributes. After that column order in getfeaturinfo request results is messed up - reordered. I could see that following requests change that order again. This kind of rule order