Re: [Geoserver-users] Time Zone issue with dates using GeoServer WFS

-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Geoserver-users] Time Zone issue with dates using GeoServer WFS On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Chris Buckmaster <chris.buckmas...@runnymede.gov.uk<mailto:chris.buckmas...@runnymede.gov.uk>> wrote: Ah, bummer – any suggestions when using

Re: [Geoserver-users] Time Zone issue with dates using GeoServer WFS

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Chris Buckmaster < chris.buckmas...@runnymede.gov.uk> wrote: > Ah, bummer – any suggestions when using version 2.5, or would I need to > upgrade? Or any ways I can serve my data in different ways so it will not > modify my dates and introduce time zone details? >

Re: [Geoserver-users] Time Zone issue with dates using GeoServer WFS

2016 09:47 To: Chris Buckmaster Cc: geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Geoserver-users] Time Zone issue with dates using GeoServer WFS On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Andrea Aime <andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it<mailto:andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it>> wrote: There was

Re: [Geoserver-users] Time Zone issue with dates using GeoServer WFS

issue with dates using GeoServer WFS On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Chris Buckmaster <chris.buckmas...@runnymede.gov.uk<mailto:chris.buckmas...@runnymede.gov.uk>> wrote: The problem I am encountering is, for any dates that fall within British summer time (GMT Daylight Saving Time)

Re: [Geoserver-users] Time Zone issue with dates using GeoServer WFS

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > >> There was a discussion about this topic on geotools-devel some time ago, > the outcome was that yes, also dates have timezone (not hard to grasp, > e.g., now it's Wednesday here in Europe, but in a few hours

Re: [Geoserver-users] Time Zone issue with dates using GeoServer WFS

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Chris Buckmaster < chris.buckmas...@runnymede.gov.uk> wrote: > The problem I am encountering is, for any dates that fall within British > summer time (GMT Daylight Saving Time), it appears to be moving the actual > date back by one day (i.e. for a date stored as