> I would like to suggest that the getDefault * methods be depricated and
> then removed?
> And and createPointSymbolizer() return a symbolizer set up according to
> the defaults (specfied in the SLD 1.0 spec).
>
> Can anyone think of a reason why I should not do this? This *is* a
> Factory its job
View results here ->
http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_current?log=log20051208022911
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX s
Hi Justin,
Thank you for the new projection. I have hardly had any time to do any
geotools work in the last half year, but 2.2 already has two new
projections!
I wont have much time to review this until the weekend, but here are a
few comments after looking at the code for 5 minutes (they build
View results here ->
http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_current?log=log20051207213951
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX s
Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
I had a look at some of the style model objects implementations. I
notice the equals() methods all look for an instance of the same Impl
class, and not of the actual interface. For example FillImpl:
[...snip...]
Isn't this a problem? If someone comes along with th
Duplicate Filters/Expression with a Factory
---
Key: GEOT-783
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-783
Project: GeoTools
Type: Bug
Components: filter & expression
Reporter: Jody Garnett
Fix For: 2.2.M3
We n
SLD 1.0 Conformance
---
Key: GEOT-782
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-782
Project: GeoTools
Type: Bug
Components: styling
Versions: 2.2.M2
Reporter: Jody Garnett
Fix For: 2.2.M3
Jody ---
Ran through the Style Interfac
Style Clone should Duplicate
Key: GEOT-781
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-781
Project: GeoTools
Type: Bug
Components: styling
Reporter: Jody Garnett
Jody Garnett wrote:
> I do not see facilities in the toolkit for du
Style Clone
---
Key: GEOT-780
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-780
Project: GeoTools
Type: Bug
Components: styling
Versions: 2.2.M2
Reporter: Jody Garnett
I had a look at some of the style model objects implementations. I notice t
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
I had a look at some of the style model objects implementations. I
notice the equals() methods all look for an instance of the same Impl
class, and not of the actual interface. For example FillImpl:
public boolean equals(Object oth) {
if (this == oth) {
View results here ->
http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_current?log=log20051207204559
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX s
I had a look at some of the style model objects implementations. I
notice the equals() methods all look for an instance of the same Impl
class, and not of the actual interface. For example FillImpl:
public boolean equals(Object oth) {
if (this == oth) {
return true;
Jody Garnett wrote:
I do not see facilities in the toolkit for duplicating Filter /
Expression / Style.
I am finding some errors in the test cases as bad assumptions are made
about Symbolizer reuse
Found a scary example of Styles being cloned in a test case:
Style clone = (Style) ((Clonea
Jody Garnett wrote:
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Jody Garnett wrote:
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Hi all,
To summarize up front, I would like to change the type of the
"ContrastEnhancment" reference on SelectedChannelType from
Expression to ContrastEhnancment. Continue on for more details.
and
The simplified event model is in, javadocs have the instructions.
You are all clear to fix that problem you found Justin.
I have temporarily left the "multiple parent" bug in the system, aka
some of the test cases
reuse a Stroke in a couple Symbolizers - and thus would/should fail.
I will go b
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Jody Garnett wrote:
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Hi all,
To summarize up front, I would like to change the type of the
"ContrastEnhancment" reference on SelectedChannelType from
Expression to ContrastEhnancment. Continue on for more details.
and matches up nicely with
Jody Garnett wrote:
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Hi all,
To summarize up front, I would like to change the type of the
"ContrastEnhancment" reference on SelectedChannelType from Expression
to ContrastEhnancment. Continue on for more details.
and matches up nicely with the spec. So I would like
View results here ->
http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_current?log=log20051207183222
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX s
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Hi all,
To summarize up front, I would like to change the type of the
"ContrastEnhancment" reference on SelectedChannelType from Expression
to ContrastEhnancment. Continue on for more details.
and matches up nicely with the spec. So I would like to change the
type o
I do not see facilities in the toolkit for duplicating Filter /
Expression / Style.
I am finding some errors in the test cases as bad assumptions are made
about Symbolizer reuse
More hack lest chat ...
Jody
---
This SF.net email is spo
Hi Martin,
Thanks for looking it over, and yes go ahead and make all those members
private.
-Justin
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
Hello Justin
Thanks for adding a new projection. Can I turn the inner fields
(currently public or package-privated) like 'A', 'B', 'PHIo', as private
fields?
Hi all,
To summarize up front, I would like to change the type of the
"ContrastEnhancment" reference on SelectedChannelType from Expression to
ContrastEhnancment. Continue on for more details.
Looking at the SLD 1.0.0 schema I see:
Martin Desruisseaux a écrit :
Thanks for adding a new projection. Can I turn the inner fields
(currently public or package-privated) like 'A', 'B', 'PHIo', as private
fields?
Actually, can I move the new NZMGTransform in the 'projection' package
as a subclass of MapProjection? I add a look at
One of the fun things hooking up events is doing is this:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Please remove from existing parent first
at
org.geotools.event.AbstractGTComponent.setParent(AbstractGTComponent.java:203)
at org.geotools.styling.RuleImpl.setSymbolizers(RuleImpl.java:106)
at
Hello Justin
Thanks for adding a new projection. Can I turn the inner fields
(currently public or package-privated) like 'A', 'B', 'PHIo', as private
fields?
Martin.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep th
On 12/7/05, Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Macgill wrote:
> > I do like the idea of helper methods and classes for develoeprs but I
> > worry about hiding them inside the implemenation classes. In your
> > example last() would work for any implemenation of List so why hide it
> >
James Macgill wrote:
I do like the idea of helper methods and classes for develoeprs but I
worry about hiding them inside the implemenation classes. In your
example last() would work for any implemenation of List so why hide it
inside the implementation?
Because client code knows what they ar
I do like the idea of helper methods and classes for develoeprs but I
worry about hiding them inside the implemenation classes. In your
example last() would work for any implemenation of List so why hide it
inside the implementation?
James
> >
> > I don't know how this can be applied to GeoTools
P.Rizzi Ag.Mobilità Ambiente wrote:
I read the liked article and I should say I never thought abot that before.
Anyway I like the minimal interface style (also extreme programming says not
to implement something until is actually needed, if I remember well).
Then one may implement a wrapper or he
I got a couple bounces because:
Your mail to 'Geotools-devel' with the subject
Re: [Geotools-devel] RE: [Geoserver-devel] Re: [Geoserver-users]
netcdf - wcs resource
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Too many recipients to
I have been doin this a little in the WMS module. I found that if I was
doing something multiple times in uDig with regards to WMS, I would add
it to the WMS interface in GeoTools.
Actually, there is still a lot of code I want to move into WMS from uDig.
I like the humane interface idea, but I
View results here ->
http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_current?log=log20051207103551
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX s
I read the liked article and I should say I never thought abot that before.
Anyway I like the minimal interface style (also extreme programming says not
to implement something until is actually needed, if I remember well).
Then one may implement a wrapper or helper class that gives a more human
fri
Folks,
What
is the plan then? I was wondering where the sources would be. Thank
you.
v/r,
Efren
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Alex
PetkovSent: Friday, December 02, 2005 1:50 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: Amit Parashar
Thank you for your response. This is our current state of affairs, where
MBL (Metoc Broker Language), JMBL (Joint Metoc Broker Language):
+-> MBL <-+
+-> ...
| |
"Efren Serra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>12/02/2005 10:02 PSTPlease respond to To "Woolf, A \(Andrew\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Rob Atkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc "Alexander Petkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Norman Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Dietmar Muller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Kei
HI List, Hy guys,
I am jumping in the conversion quite late, but I was stuck on another
project, sorry.
I see a lot of interest around netCDF and NdCoverages, with plenty of
good ideas to share, therefore my suggestion is, as we already did, to
arrange an IRC session to dig a bit in each others ne
Efren Serra wrote:
Folks,
As far as the GML 3.1 specification and GML schemas - coverages in
particular, what is implemented in either geotools or geoserver?
Is the gml:FileType implemented? Thank you.
We have some code for GML3 over in udig land, ask Justin for details.
Some support for
Rob,
Thank you for your response. This is our current state of affairs, where
MBL (Metoc Broker Language), JMBL (Joint Metoc Broker Language):
+-> MBL <-++-> ...
| ||
Client(s) <--+-> JMBL <-+
Folks,
Thank you for the references below. I am going to take a look at them.
v/r,
Efren
-Original Message-
From: Woolf, A (Andrew) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:32 AM
To: Rob Atkinson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Alexander Petkov; Norman Barker;
[EMAIL PROTEC
There are known issues with time/date in geotools.
I've attached your comment to:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-378
Basically, the way geotools handles date/time attributes is a bit
'weak'.
dave
--
This mail sent through IMP: htt
GeoTools2 module build report 20051206
gt2:referencing cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2356
gt2:coverage cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357
gt2:api cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357
gt2:main cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2359
gt2:shapefile cleaned, co
42 matches
Mail list logo
