[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/07/2006 03:12:23 PM:
> Paul Ramsey ha scritto:
> > Which leads to the next set of cases, given a map in CARTESIAN_2D,
> > what to do when layers that have valid CRS information are added.
> > Probably ignore the CRS information and just draw them directly in.
> Agai
Andrea Aime a écrit :
It seems to me the most sensible choice for an unknown CRS is
DefaultEngineeringCRS.CARTESIAN_2D, which has special handling to be
a good default cartesian CRS (in particular, every transformation that
involves it is an identity).
Actually DefaultEngineeringCRS.GENERIC_2
Simone Giannecchini ha scritto:
Hi guys,
I agree with Bryce, the choice of WGS84 was due to convenience reasons
since the vast amjority of time people I have talked to, uses it.
I hope Andrea will be able to give a hand with coverages since there
are so many things to do in order to improve thin
Bryce L Nordgren ha scritto:
Hi. Sorry for the short note, but I'm just on my lunchbreak. Class
occupies a lot of time this week.
ISO 19123 specifies an EngineeringCRS as the appropriate representation of
gridded data with no known georeferencing info, exactly as you propose.
It's not just a g
Paul Ramsey ha scritto:
We have discussed this in the past, and would not be surprised if
there is something written down somewhere, if only in Jesse's notes.
This is just one of those things which has several cases, so instead
of spending effort on doing it right, we did the simple thing and
We have discussed this in the past, and would not be surprised if
there is something written down somewhere, if only in Jesse's notes.
This is just one of those things which has several cases, so instead
of spending effort on doing it right, we did the simple thing and use
WGS84 all the ti
Hi guys,
I agree with Bryce, the choice of WGS84 was due to convenience reasons
since the vast amjority of time people I have talked to, uses it.
I hope Andrea will be able to give a hand with coverages since there
are so many things to do in order to improve things (caching,
overviews, better ren
Hi. Sorry for the short note, but I'm just on my lunchbreak. Class
occupies a lot of time this week.
ISO 19123 specifies an EngineeringCRS as the appropriate representation of
gridded data with no known georeferencing info, exactly as you propose.
It's not just a good idea, it's the law. ;) The
Andrea Aime wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at the grid coverage readers, and found out that
AbstractGridFormat
defines WGS84 as the default crs. This is used by the WorldImagePlugin
if not
.prj file is avaiable to define more precisely the grid coverage format.
Now, this decision seems a little prob
Hi,
I'm looking at the grid coverage readers, and found out that AbstractGridFormat
defines WGS84 as the default crs. This is used by the WorldImagePlugin if not
.prj file is avaiable to define more precisely the grid coverage format.
Now, this decision seems a little problematic to me. If we loa
View results here ->
http://geovista16.geog.psu.edu/cruisecontrol/buildresults/geotools_current?log=log20060207050312
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX s
GeoTools2 module build report 20060206
gt2:referencing cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357
gt2:sample-data cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357
gt2:coverage cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2358
gt2:api cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2358
gt2:main cleaned,
12 matches
Mail list logo
