Jody Garnett a écrit :
- can we post some javadocs from the 2.2.x branch? Part of Dave marking
things stable is the need to post the javadocs.
We already have javadoc for the 2.2 branch, as well as 2.3:
http://javadoc.geotools.fr/
I believe that the 2.2 branch was for 2.2-RC0 however. I w
Jody Garnett a écrit :
I would like to format up 2.2.x when it is released, and then stick with
it (aka format before every commit like the bad old days).
I have two issues with reformating:
1) We have at least two different coding rules in use. When we talked about
coding rule for the
who
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
I'm just writing up documentation getting people to switch to 2.2, but I
cannot get it building:
testConcurrentReadWrite(org.geotools.data.shapefile.ShapefileReadWriteTest):
Caused an ERROR
The requested operation cannot be performed on a file with a user-mapped
Bryce L Nordgren a écrit :
The representation of gridded data in ISO19123 is a minimum of 175 times
larger than the data it represents. (No joke: that is conservative.) The
call "DiscreteGridPointCoverage.list().toArray()" on a 1000x1000 grid of
single-band byte data (0.95Mb) seems innocent eno
On 3/10/06, Richard Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've uploaded the 2.2.RC1 jars tohttp://lists.refractions.net/geotools/dist/2.2.RC1/gt2/jars
thanks
I don't believe i have access to dist.geotools.org
to upload them there.If so, how do I access it? WebDAV?
I'm not even sure where it is, maybe
Hi developers,
Something came across my mind when I investigated my first careful steps
towards an attribute table widget, i.e. a widget that allows to view/edit
the attribute values of features.
I have already worked with several kinds of tables so far: DBase tables and
meteorological time serie
Jody wrote:
> So before we continue w/ this conversation I gotta confirm what you are
> testing?
> - geotools/branches/fm
No. I don't intend to interfer with this.
> - geoapi/pending
Since I had not followed this topic much until now I didn't realize there is
something like "geoapi/pending". I
Matthias Basler wrote:
I wondered if it is me being too stupid or the API being poorly designed or
Eclipse Java tools being buggy. So I did a test.
So before we continue w/ this conversation I gotta confirm what you are
testing?
- geotools/branches/fm
- geoapi/pending
It sounds like you are
Matthias Basler wrote:
Hi developers.
Today I tried, out of interest, to create a simple implementation of some
feature-related GeoAPI classes, among them "FeatureCollection". I got stuck
with FeatureCollection however, getting several name clashes, some of which
I could not resolve.
I wondered
Hi developers.
Today I tried, out of interest, to create a simple implementation of some
feature-related GeoAPI classes, among them "FeatureCollection". I got stuck
with FeatureCollection however, getting several name clashes, some of which
I could not resolve.
I wondered if it is me being too st
Adrian Custer wrote:
Hey Jody,
Is there an online javadoc presentation of the 2.2.x branch of geotools
rather than the 2.3.x branch? It seems like all uDig user questions, and
most geotools user questions should point to the 2.2.x branch rather
than to the javadocs of head (aka 2.3). We have eno
Paul Ramsey wrote:
On Mar 10, 2006, at 2:11 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
I would like to format up 2.2.x when it is released, and then stick
with it (aka format before every commit like the bad old days).
Just to confirm for people, autoformatting would mean that the
workflow would be:
svn
GeoTools2 module build report 20060310
gt2:referencing cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357
gt2:sample-data cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357
gt2:coverage cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357
gt2:api cleaned, compiled, tested, INSTALLED 2357
gt2:main cleaned,
13 matches
Mail list logo
