Ha, thanks Richard! :)
I have created a jira task asking for this mofification.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPECLIPSE-122
Having a bit of a problem submitting my patch though, the trunk version
of the plugin does not seem to build.
-Justin
Gabriel Roldán wrote:
> cool cool
>
> "join us n
cool cool
"join us now
and share the software,
you'll be free hacker,
you'll be free"
R.S.
On Saturday 05 August 2006 00:30, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> I had the same request. I checked out the maven-eclipse-plugin and made
> the modification, it was pretty straight forward. I just need to find
Jody Garnett wrote:
Thanks for taking up the ideas Gabriel, I am going to rant for a bit
(because I think I just went through these ideas with Justin in person -
so if this is old news please forgive). I am only excited be cause I
care, and only care because I am excited.
Jessy and I were ra
I had the same request. I checked out the maven-eclipse-plugin and made
the modification, it was pretty straight forward. I just need to find
the time to open up the jira and include the patch.
-Justin
Gabriel Roldán wrote:
> would it be possible to include the geotools version in the name of t
Randy George wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Is this the relevant connector config for Tomcat 5.5 server.xml?
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.0-doc/config/http.html
It looks like two attributes are needed assuming you wish to add additional
mimetypes:
"compressableMimeType": The value is a comma separated
Gabriel Roldán ha scritto:
> would it be possible to include the geotools version in the name of the maven
> generated eclipse project?.
> I know this topic was mentioned previously but don't know if there were any
> answer.
>
I don't think so. Your best bet is to open a JIRA enhancement reque
would it be possible to include the geotools version in the name of the maven
generated eclipse project?.
I know this topic was mentioned previously but don't know if there were any
answer.
Note that it would be very helpful when dealing with more than one branch, or
need to apply fixes to a bra
They were made to be Filter.ALL and Filter.NONE. They're static
singleton constructs I think off the Filter main class.
They should be really easy to implement, and I'd say you should just
implement them, you just have to do a query as if there was no filter,
and do a query to return nothing.
I agree with Chris, the problem is on the SAX parser that produce
strange result when parsing WFS requests. For example I have logged
the following (that can be useful for fixing the problem):
the log have the following pattern:
The WFS query used for reproduce the result, has a property named
Hi Jesse,
Sounds like you are having fun with the filter spec :). I am working on
gtxml bindings for filter 1.1 parsing so this somewhat applies to me as
well.
This is a tough call to make. I kind of feel uncomfortable forcing this
type of logic onto the client. To have to decide to try and us
For those interested. It appears that http://gdsg.ngdc.noaa.gov/
geotools-main/apidocs/org/geotools/referencing/crs/
EngineeringCRS.html#GENERIC_2D seems to fit the bill (thanks Paul).
Jesse
On 4-Aug-06, at 9:15 AM, Jesse Eichar wrote:
> To clarify.
>
> What I'm looking for is when I ask for
To clarify.
What I'm looking for is when I ask for a transformation between the
"Unkown" CRS and any other CRS I get a NO-OP transformation. Maybe a
new "Unkown" CRS is what I want?
Jesse
On 4-Aug-06, at 8:25 AM, Jesse Eichar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need a "Default" CRS for uDig when the CRS is
Hi,
I need a "Default" CRS for uDig when the CRS is not known. I am
currently using Cartesian but that is not working because there are
no transformations between Cartesian and WGS84 (and other map
projections). What I want is a CRS that will that always has an
Affine transform to any ot
The same issue exists in Filter 1.1. And using a function won't help because third party servers won't support the function. I working with Ionic's Redspider server and it can't read our filters. I've made up a work around. I'm adding a hint to the XML Filter Encoding so that you can set the co
Hi Adrian,
Yes when the Feature Model eventually comes out (usual disclaimer of
pending time, funding, cooperation) it will need to be explicit if it is
making use of a simple feature model (simple == 'flat').
I would expect that with Java 5 we could explicitly return
SimpleFeatureType and Sim
hey all,
I'd like to implement a memory data store that stored the attribute
array in libR, the engine for the R statistical language. However, I
don't want to store any arbitrary attribute the way the new feature
model does but only totally flat features:
ID:Geometry: 1D Attribute Array
Is there
Thanks for taking up the ideas Gabriel, I am going to rant for a bit
(because I think I just went through these ideas with Justin in person -
so if this is old news please forgive). I am only excited be cause I
care, and only care because I am excited.
>>> Jessy and I were ranting about adding t
Jesse can you please confirm against Filter 1.1? What you say sounds
pretty silly, if needed we can work around it with a function :-(
Also note that Filter is available in a BNF form as part of the catalog
specification - we really need to take a common ground, and police what
is created throug
18 matches
Mail list logo
