Hi Andrea,
Glad to see some interest in FM. Jody will be able to better answer your
questions but I thought I would throw my two cents in on a couple of things.
I think for now there wouldn't be any "data" support for complex
content, just the model. Not until we rescue gabriels complex-features
On Sunday 06 August 2006 16:00, Simone Giannecchini wrote:
> I fully agree with Andrea, we have been playing around the all week
> with different writers and the conclusion is that if you want to speed
> up things you need to use gif or png with indexed color model, if you
> want to dramatically sp
Hi all,
me and Andrea discussed a bit about where to do this indexing/caching
of features.
While in the mid-long run the best place would be at datastore level
for the moment it would be interesting to make this hack work inside
the renderer just to show the real potential.
If I recall correctly (m
First of all I think it is worth that everybody involved in this
discussion were aware of this link:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/The+axis+order+issue
That said, let me first start with a snapshot of the situation, but
let me also remind that the guru here is Martin.
Situation is as
I fully agree with Andrea, we have been playing around the all week
with different writers and the conclusion is that if you want to speed
up things you need to use gif or png with indexed color model, if you
want to dramatically speed up thing you need to used natively in the
streaming renderer im
Hi Jody,
I'm reading the FM docs available online to try and understand the next
storm that will hit geotools trunk.
I'm writing down questions as I go, so sorry if the mail is not well
organised.
*) http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Feature+Model+Branch
- AbstractDataStore is focused on
Adrian Custer ha scritto:
> On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 22:35 +0200, Jody Garnett wrote:
>
>> I also admit that if you want to step forward as a module maintainer we
>> are open to maintaining and making "something" available
>> that is more useful (even if it is just an out reach to the geowidgets
On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 22:35 +0200, Jody Garnett wrote:
> I also admit that if you want to step forward as a module maintainer we
> are open to maintaining and making "something" available
> that is more useful (even if it is just an out reach to the geowidgets
> project).
No! No! No! Geotools mu
