Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools-trunk build.54 Build Fixed

2006-10-16 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
The build failure that occurs randomely in org.geotools.referencing.operation.calculator (a new package commited recently as a result of SoC work) is probably caused by the test suite using java.util.Random without explicit seed. The fix is trivial - I will add a seed value tomorrow. Today is a

[Geotools-devel] geotools-trunk build.54 Build Fixed

2006-10-16 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-trunk?log=log20061016215543Lbuild.54 - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integra

[Geotools-devel] geotools-trunk Build Failed

2006-10-16 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-trunk?log=log20061016214939 - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated techn

[Geotools-devel] Hacking and Hacking your own module

2006-10-16 Thread Jody Garnett
I have broken up the Hacking page ... - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/Hacking It is now limited to documenting how to interact with a module maintainer (that is hacking existing code). And create the following page: - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/Hacking+your+own+Module This fo

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools developers guide and testing ...

2006-10-16 Thread Jody Garnett
I have also updated the naming convention page (for both Test and OnlineTest) - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/5.2+Naming+Conventions Is there anything more to it then that? Jody > Hi Andrea, > > A couple of test case based questions for you - the GeoTools developers > guide has fallen a

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools developers guide and testing ...

2006-10-16 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Andrea, A couple of test case based questions for you - the GeoTools developers guide has fallen a bit behind our current practice (ie what to do with OnlineTest is not documented). I have updated this page and marked it as pending: - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/5.7+Testing Am I o

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving ArcSDE to "supported"

2006-10-16 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Gabriel, Tried to write up this email for you here: - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/Supporting+your+module Jody Page is marked pending > Hi Gabriel, > > Email off-line about your meeting question - here is what is needed > RIGHT NOW: > - we need to follow the developers guide (check?)

Re: [Geotools-devel] ShapefileDataStore.modifyFeatureType(...) improvement

2006-10-16 Thread Cory Horner
Vitali Diatchkov wrote: >I would like to see a method > >public void ShapefileDataStore.modifyFeatureType(AttributeType[] >removedTypes, AttributeType[] addedTypes, Object[] defaultAddedValues) >throws IOException; > >for modifying current ShapefileDataStore schema. >... >I have implemented the me

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt2 --> gt

2006-10-16 Thread Jody Garnett
Martin we will need to update the developers guide after your change: - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/5.3+Module+Directory+Structure This may be as simple as saying "use maven defaults" but that one is kind of your call Jody > Hi Martin, do you want to change the "gt2" prefix to "gt

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt2 --> gt

2006-10-16 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Jody Garnett a écrit : > Hi Martin, do you want to change the "gt2" prefix to "gt", in much the > same way we renamed the project from GeoTools2 to GeoTools. I'm fine with that. Martin - Using Tomcat but need to do

[Geotools-devel] gt2 --> gt

2006-10-16 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Martin, do you want to change the "gt2" prefix to "gt", in much the same way we renamed the project from GeoTools2 to GeoTools. A thought for your sunday maven efforts, Jody - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to sup

[Geotools-devel] Label content modified for OSGeo involvement

2006-10-16 Thread Jody Garnett
I have defined two "labels" for the developer guide space: - pending - highlight proposed changes - osgeo - content revised for OSGeo foundation On the top page of the developers guide you can see a "focus" heading with these two labels listed, click on them to view a list of the pages thus tagg

[Geotools-devel] Changes to developers guide (for OSGeo involvement & unsupported modules)

2006-10-16 Thread Jody Garnett
As the (last?) couple hurdles towards OSGeo incubation we need to update our formal documentation and procedures. (gulp!) I have prepared the following pages: the boxes marked "pending" contain revised text ... - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/1+Contributors - http://docs.codehaus.org/di

[Geotools-devel] GTSteering2006Q4 available in svn ...

2006-10-16 Thread Jody Garnett
This document captures what is going on for the forth quarter of 2006, we can produce another one in January. Updates before "publication": - find OSGeo template and logos We can produce another one in January, and if the format is of benefit we can start looking into things like asking the PMC

Re: [Geotools-devel] Factories: a proposal

2006-10-16 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Jeff Yutzler a écrit : > Why are the hints dissociated from the classes that use them? Any why > have we bastardized the AWT class RenderingHints with things that have > nothing to do with rendering? It is partly a remanescence of historical reasons: the Hints were at first used in J2D-Rendere

Re: [Geotools-devel] IRC Meeting Logs

2006-10-16 Thread Jody Garnett
Jody Garnett wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Looks like most people are going to be around for the IRC meeting today, > this is a reminder - and the start of an agenda. > simboss>but right now people are doing it on trunk with the feature part of the world and I cannot af

Re: [Geotools-devel] PMC: svn access policy for "unsupported" directory

2006-10-16 Thread Jody Garnett
So lets try again ... Discussed in todays IRC ... final proposal was for. Required for svn access: - wiki page - read the developers guide - email request - approved by any PMC Required upkeep: - status email We use jira to build our change log, so we will need to provide either: - an "unsuppor

Re: [Geotools-devel] PMC: svn access policy for "unsupported" directory

2006-10-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Jody Garnett ha scritto: >>> Discussed in todays IRC ... final proposal was for. >>> >>> Require: >>> - wiki page >>> - email request >>> - weekly status email, >>> >> Well, as long as the module is in real development they are fine, but >>

Re: [Geotools-devel] PMC: svn access policy for "unsupported" directory

2006-10-16 Thread Jody Garnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> Discussed in todays IRC ... final proposal was for. >> >> Require: >> - wiki page >> - email request >> - weekly status email, >> > Well, as long as the module is in real development they are fine, but > once you manage to get to a slower pa

Re: [Geotools-devel] PMC: svn access policy for "unsupported" directory

2006-10-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Discussed in todays IRC ... final proposal was for. > > Require: > - wiki page > - email request > - weekly status email, > Well, as long as the module is in real development they are fine, but once you manage to get to a slower pace of development, even because you're

[Geotools-devel] PMC: svn access policy for "unsupported" directory

2006-10-16 Thread Jody Garnett
Discussed in todays IRC ... final proposal was for. Require: - wiki page - email request - weekly status email, - approved by any PMC - read the developers guide Cheers, Jody - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to supp

[Geotools-devel] Moving ArcSDE to "supported"

2006-10-16 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Gabriel, Email off-line about your meeting question - here is what is needed RIGHT NOW: - we need to follow the developers guide (check?) including code coverage (running from cruise control will be fine) - we need to have the review.txt up to date with no known issues (check?) - make sure you

Re: [Geotools-devel] Minor changes proposal for the calculator package

2006-10-16 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Thanks Jan, I applied the changes (should be commited today). For now I'm still working primarily on MathTransformBuilder (the change applied in other classes are only the changes required in order to keep the library compiling and running without test failures). I also applied the following ad

Re: [Geotools-devel] Help with svn merge

2006-10-16 Thread Richard Gould
David Adler wrote: > I'm trying to apply the DB2 changes I made to 2.2.x to 2.3.x and trunk. > > I tried the command: > svn merge -r 21897:21898 http://svn.geotools.org/branches/2.2.x > That should be: svn merge -r 21897:21898 http://svn.geotools.org/geotools/branches/2.2.x . (in your 2.3.x/ a

Re: [Geotools-devel] Help with svn merge

2006-10-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Adler ha scritto: > I'm trying to apply the DB2 changes I made to 2.2.x to 2.3.x and trunk. > > I tried the command: > svn merge -r 21897:21898 http://svn.geotools.org/branches/2.2.x > in my 2.3.x source tree and got the messages > I usually do it piecemeal, instead of doing it with svn me

[Geotools-devel] IRC Meeting reminder

2006-10-16 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Everyone, Looks like most people are going to be around for the IRC meeting today, this is a reminder - and the start of an agenda. #1 GeoTools 2.2.1 Needs a volunteer to make the anouncements #2 GeoTools 2.3.0 release Simone is heading up the release effort this week, once again those with

Re: [Geotools-devel] Factories: a proposal

2006-10-16 Thread Jeff Yutzler
I know I'm a bit late to this thread, but I figured I'd chime in anyway. Why are the hints dissociated from the classes that use them? Any why have we bastardized the AWT class RenderingHints with things that have nothing to do with rendering? Also, forcing implementers to reference some oth

[Geotools-devel] Help with svn merge

2006-10-16 Thread David Adler
I'm trying to apply the DB2 changes I made to 2.2.x to 2.3.x and trunk. I tried the command: svn merge -r 21897:21898 http://svn.geotools.org/branches/2.2.x in my 2.3.x source tree and got the messages svn: REPORT request failed on '/!svn/vcc/default' svn: Cannot replace a directory from within

Re: [Geotools-devel] "mvn javadoc:javadoc" fixed on trunk

2006-10-16 Thread Jody Garnett
Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Hello Corry > > Cory Horner a écrit : > >> This should definitely be merged back to the 2.3 and 2.2 branches. >> Keeping all three consistent is very important for the release process, >> and our sanity. >> > > I merged the fix to the 2.3 branch. The 2.2 bran

Re: [Geotools-devel] krovak projection

2006-10-16 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Hello Jan Jan Jezek a écrit : > May be that I can look into it and try to add this projection in near future. > What is yours openion on that? Sure, if you are volunter for that feel welcolme! Martin - Using Tomcat

Re: [Geotools-devel] "mvn javadoc:javadoc" fixed on trunk

2006-10-16 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Hello Corry Cory Horner a écrit : > This should definitely be merged back to the 2.3 and 2.2 branches. > Keeping all three consistent is very important for the release process, > and our sanity. I merged the fix to the 2.3 branch. The 2.2 branch is a different story since it had its own Ant

Re: [Geotools-devel] "mvn javadoc:javadoc" fixed on trunk

2006-10-16 Thread Cory Horner
Martin Desruisseaux wrote: >Upgrated to maven-javadoc-plugin version 2.1, which fixes a number of bugs. >The >Maven build do not fails anymore when running "mvn javadoc:javadoc" - >dependencies are found, and all taglets work. > >Changes applied from revision 22110 to 22113 (inclusive) on trunk

[Geotools-devel] krovak projection

2006-10-16 Thread Jan Jezek
Hello Martin, Do you remember as we have been talking at FOSS4G about the projection used in Czech Republic – the Krovak one? I've take a look at org.geotools.referencing.operation.projection package and I think that this projection is missing there. As I said – it is quit complicated and unus

Re: [Geotools-devel] Apparently innocuous exceptions on trunk?

2006-10-16 Thread openplans
Gah, sorry, I keep on getting the wrong ml... Cheers Andrea openplans ha scritto: > Hi, > every time I do modify a jsp or otherwise clean the target folder so > that jetty has to compile it, I see the following on the console. > > Everything seems to run fine otherwise, but I don't really like the

[Geotools-devel] Apparently innocuous exceptions on trunk?

2006-10-16 Thread openplans
Hi, every time I do modify a jsp or otherwise clean the target folder so that jetty has to compile it, I see the following on the console. Everything seems to run fine otherwise, but I don't really like these exceptions. Does anyone of you have any clue about it? Cheers Andrea 2006-10-16 19:02:

[Geotools-devel] geotools-trunk build.49 Build Fixed

2006-10-16 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-trunk?log=log20061016083719Lbuild.49 - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integra

[Geotools-devel] geotools-trunk Build Failed

2006-10-16 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-trunk?log=log20061016083101 - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated techn

Re: [Geotools-devel] Minor changes proposal for the calculator package

2006-10-16 Thread Jan Jezek
__ > Od: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Komu: Jan Jezek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: [email protected] > Datum: 14.10.2006 03:10 > Předmět: Minor changes proposal for the calculator package > >Hello Jan > >What about the following mod