Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools license

True enough. You don't have to re-license if you can work within the terms of the license, and it is pretty easy to work within the terms of the LGPL. P On 8-Nov-06, at 7:13 PM, Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Joe L a écrit : >> I work on a government contract, and your GIS tools look like >>

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools license

If you cannot bear to release the changes you make to GeoTools you'll have to look for another option.  You don't have to release anything else, but if you are shipping a changed version of GeoTools you'll have to release. Share and share alike, it's a small price to pay for access to a free librar

Re: [Geotools-devel] how many optimizations can you count? (or trunk & shapefile test data hate me ... )

Jody Garnett wrote: > ShapeFileReader.getCount > - takes with readRecord until readRecord returns -1 > > This loop finds 3 features when using the "jar:/" URL and 49 when > using the "file:/..." URL - cannot figure out the bug so far. > ShapeFileReader has a loop near the end of readRecord(

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools license

Joe L a écrit : > I work on a government contract, and your GIS tools look like something > we could use. I know you're released under LGPL (AFAIK). This would > usually be fine, but we're releasing our product using ULC > (www.canoo.com ), which means that we will > pro

[Geotools-devel] how many optimizations can you count? (or trunk & shapefile test data hate me ... )

From within eclipse everything works in the following test: > public void testLoadAndVerify() throws Exception { > FeatureCollection features = loadFeatures(STATE_POP, > Query.ALL); > assertEquals("Number of Features loaded",49,features.size()); > } The referenced data is:

Re: [Geotools-devel] Does anyone have a good email for David Adler?

I have a list of rejected mails to that address; many were CCed to the list as well. Let's treat this reply as a test and see what happens, Jody > [EMAIL PROTECTED] should work. Is this what was getting rejected? I > have a bunch of others but prefer to use this with the newsgroup. > > Regards,

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools license

Hi,I work on a government contract, and your GIS tools look like something we could use.  I know you're released under LGPL (AFAIK).  This would usually be fine, but we're releasing our product using ULC (www.canoo.com), which means that we will probably be required to make some changes to the soft

Re: [Geotools-devel] More on calculator package

Bryce L Nordgren a écrit : > Standard deviation is only standard deviation if the calculation is > performed on a random sampling of a normal distribution. You can use > the equation on any set of numbers, of course, but that doesn't mean > that a standard deviation pops out. :) I think in th

Re: [Geotools-devel] More on calculator package

Jan Jezek a écrit : > A very very simple class like "PointPair" is already in algorithm package and > it's name is MappedPosition I like "MappedPosition" :). It sound like a better name than PointPair. So we could just move MappedPosition to the builder package and make it public. Marti

Re: [Geotools-devel] More on calculator package

Hello Martin, I looked into the code and your changes are surely helpful and I agree with your proposal. A very very simple class like "PointPair" is already in algorithm package and it's name is MappedPosition, but it is just for internal purpose for RubberSheetTansformation. The PointPair sho

Re: [Geotools-devel] Semantic questions

Hello Sanjay I don't know yet for the semantic question; I will try to have a though about that. However, in a hope to make sharing easier, I created a (initially empty) geometry module in Geotools. Would it be possible (if you agree of course) to commit your code in that module please? Steps

Re: [Geotools-devel] DefaultFIDMapperFactory returns "TypedFIDMapper"

Andrea Aime wrote: > Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >> Hi all, >> >> Looking at JDBCDataStore, it seems that when determining a fid mapper, >> the DefaultFIDMapperFactory wraps the fid mapper with a >> "TypedFIDMapper", which prepends the type name to the fid. Andrea, svn >> points to you. >> >> The

Re: [Geotools-devel] More on calculator package

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ->To: Jan Jezek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>From: Martin Desruisseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: 11/07/2006 09:12PM>cc: GeoTools Developers List >Subject: [Geotools-devel] More on calculator package>>Hello Jan>>I wonder if "getStandardDeviation" is the

Re: [Geotools-devel] DefaultFIDMapperFactory returns "TypedFIDMapper"

Hi David, I was actually going to leave DefautlFIDMapperFactory alone, and only make the change in PostgisFIDMapperFactory, so all other jdbc modules should remain unaffected. -Justin David Adler wrote: > I never quite understood the purpose of TypedFIDMapper but tried to keep > the functionali

Re: [Geotools-devel] Does anyone have a good email for David Adler?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] should work. Is this what was getting rejected? I have a bunch of others but prefer to use this with the newsgroup. Regards, David At 02:49 PM 11/7/2006, Jody Garnett wrote: >I am find a lot of my messages to him "returned"... or perhaps it was >something I said ;-D >Jody > >

Re: [Geotools-devel] DefaultFIDMapperFactory returns "TypedFIDMapper"

I never quite understood the purpose of TypedFIDMapper but tried to keep the functionality consistent with the changes I made to the FIDMapper classes. If the DefaultFIDMapperFactory is changed, it will break some of the DB2 junit testcases although this isn't a major problem. Whether it breaks