[Geotools-devel] Building ArcSDE 2.2.x plugin

2006-12-06 Thread Jesse Eichar
Seems ArcSDE is not included in the plugins pom.xml so it doesn't get built by default... seems to me that this should was probably done because the dummy jar wasn't around... But now it is so should I put it back in? Jesse ---

[Geotools-devel] Error rendering ArcSDE

2006-12-06 Thread Jesse Eichar
I'm using ArcSDE built from 2.2.x, 2.2.3-SNAPSHOT to be exact. Does this stack trace mean anything. Maybe I have the wrong jsde-sdk jar? I believe I have the 9.0 jar. What verison should I use? Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: SE_OPTIMIZE at org.geotools.data.arcsde.ArcSDEQuery.cre

[Geotools-devel] 2.2.2 on sf and deployed on maven repo, announcements, on Monday

2006-12-06 Thread Andrea Aime
As stated, I've worked so far to finish at least the release... tomorrow I won't work for gt2/geoserver so announcements will be probably made on Monday. Cheers Andrea - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Joi

[Geotools-devel] 2.2.x open for business

2006-12-06 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, I'm still fighting with sourceforge (after waiting 3 hours for deploying to lists.refractions.net over a relatively fast adsl), but the branch is ok for commits again. Have fun Cheers Andrea - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Inf

Re: [Geotools-devel] Administrator right on jira needed

2006-12-06 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Andrea, I am still around for some PM work - just trying to strike a better balance between email & code. You have been added to the geotools-admin Jira group and can now manage versions. I have created 2.2.3 for you while I was there. Thanks for the hard work getting 2.2.x out the door; an

[Geotools-devel] Administrator right on jira needed

2006-12-06 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, I need to create version 2.2.3 on jira and move issues there. Unfortunately it seems I do not have administrator rights so I can't create 2.2.3? Since I am PMC member I should have them I guess... can anyone give me the rights or at least create 2.2.3 for me? Cheers Andrea ---

Re: [Geotools-devel] Deploy fixed on trunk

2006-12-06 Thread Cory Horner
Cory Horner wrote: >The parent was not declared in gt/maven/archetype/pom.xml > >So we're back in business :) > > So i'm playing hookey when i'm actually on another project and Jody is busy too... could someone with a valid JAI 1.1.3 install please deploy geotools trunk :) You may have to try

[Geotools-devel] Deploy fixed on trunk

2006-12-06 Thread Cory Horner
The parent was not declared in gt/maven/archetype/pom.xml So we're back in business :) - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinion

Re: [Geotools-devel] FeatureCollection questions

2006-12-06 Thread Bryce L Nordgren
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/05/2006 08:22:26 PM: > Cool ideas!! Comments inline. Yea me! > A couple of thoughts... > > Often the attributes on the "Feature" part of the FeatureCollection are > derived from the contents of the collection. For instance, in a > GMLFeatureCollection, there is a

[Geotools-devel] geotools-trunk build.143 Build Fixed

2006-12-06 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-trunk?log=log20061206111636Lbuild.143 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chan

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools-trunk Build Failed

2006-12-06 Thread Andrea Aime
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: > View results here -> > http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-trunk?log=log20061206103542 Whoops, sorry, my fault. Fixing it right aways. Cheers Andrea - Take Surveys. Earn Cash.

[Geotools-devel] geotools-trunk Build Failed

2006-12-06 Thread jdeolive
View results here -> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/buildresults/geotools-trunk?log=log20061206103542 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to shar

[Geotools-devel] Need to change home page messages

2006-12-06 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi all, home page still directs people to 2.2.x as our stable release... well, it should be time to turn tables and say 2.2.x is old, and people experimenting or doing new projects should track 2.3.0 instead. What do you think? Cheers Andrea ---

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.2.2 release tomorrow

2006-12-06 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Aime ha scritto: > Hi all, > I'll be releasing gt2 2.2.2 tomorrow during Italian > morning. If you have anything against it, please speak > up in the next 10 hours... Well, I've started the release process. Hold on your commit guns for a few hours, would you? :-p Cheers Andrea

Re: [Geotools-devel] Oracle module in trunk/unsupported

2006-12-06 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Aime ha scritto: > Hi, > I've just committed an Oracle patch to 2.2.x, 2.3.x and tried on > trunk/oracle-spatial and now I'm wondering what to do > with the Oracle module... man, this duplication is > again like a branch, I should apply the patch there > too... Not good I don't want to

[Geotools-devel] Oracle module in trunk/unsupported

2006-12-06 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, I've just committed an Oracle patch to 2.2.x, 2.3.x and tried on trunk/oracle-spatial and now I'm wondering what to do with the Oracle module... man, this duplication is again like a branch, I should apply the patch there too... Not good I don't want to get old applying patches... Can we d

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-1057) Postgis datastore does not support extra connection parameters such as SSL

2006-12-06 Thread Andrea Aime (JIRA)
Postgis datastore does not support extra connection parameters such as SSL -- Key: GEOT-1057 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1057 Project: GeoTools Issue Type:

Re: [Geotools-devel] negotiating for scheduled releases

2006-12-06 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Aime ha scritto: >* major changes and additions shall be approved by PMC Ah, these major changes discussions could be the subject of a GSIP like document, the Geoserver Improvement Proposals: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOS/GeoServer+Improvement+Proposals at least it provides a

Re: [Geotools-devel] ScaledGridCoverage2D and CroppedCoverage2D

2006-12-06 Thread Cédric Briançon
Martin Desruisseaux a écrit : > Note for Cédric: please try to add the following line in > ScaledCoverage2D and CroppedCoverage2D (package > org.geotools.coverage.processing.operation) just before a call to > processor.createNS("Scale", ...) or processor.createNS("Translate", > ...) method (or

Re: [Geotools-devel] negotiating for scheduled releases

2006-12-06 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Saul Farber wrote: >>> I am actually hoping this reduces code branches ... both for geotools >>> and geoserver. >> So what do you see as the geoserver branch/functionality structure? > At a certaint level geotools needs to not care what geoserver > branch/functionality

Re: [Geotools-devel] GEOTDOC space

2006-12-06 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey all, My apologies for deleting your work. It would have been nice to know you were adding sections to the manual. I'm done with GEOTDOC so please delete the old manual section so no one gets confused, thanks. If you want to integrate your work into the manual someday, let me know and we ca

Re: [Geotools-devel] negotiating for scheduled releases

2006-12-06 Thread Andrea Aime
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto: > Could it be that the trouble in building Geoserver against Geotools-trunk is > partially caused by ourself not following our "API change" policy with enough > discipline? I saw some public methods where the signature was changed instead > of > adding a new meth