Adrian Custer wrote:
> Linux, to my knowledge, still doesn't have a letter and yet has
> some serious clout. So not having a letter is not the worst thing.
Adrian,
It would also be perfectly fine for GeoTools to just document the
actual copyright holders for the source. One thing I object to is
Hey all,
Unfortunately the situation is an itsy tiny bit more complicated than
what Jody sets out. Jody lays out the essentials but the problem, as I
see it, is
The letter that OSGeo has prepared doesn't work for us.
Off the top of my head (which means that I'm forgetting stuff) the
agr
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/224/buildId/458
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> Le lundi 05 février 2007 à 19:37 -0800, Jody Garnett a écrit :
>> The question is do we need these assurances in the legal document
>> (making it a two way agreement)? Contributor agreements are normally a
>> "one way declaration by the assignor that they are assignin
Le lundi 05 février 2007 à 19:37 -0800, Jody Garnett a écrit :
> The question is do we need these assurances in the legal document
> (making it a two way agreement)? Contributor agreements are normally a
> "one way declaration by the assignor that they are assigning their
> copyright to another
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/224/buildId/456
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-
So I had a nice chat with Frank today to review where we got stuck ...
here is my summary:
1. The incubation process asked us for many things, the one we are stuck
on is getting our IP situation in order.
2. To that end *we* are asking the OSGeo foundation for help : -) Namely
can they please h
Wow they are really getting organized early - Feb 28th deadline for
workshops submissions. Is it just me or did we all mis the initial
announcement?
- http://www.foss4g2007.org/workshops.html
It would be great if GeoTools had a presence :-)
Cheers,
Jody
>
> Subject: FOSS4G in Victoria, Canada,
Jesse Eichar ha scritto:
> I'm currently doing some work on the Shapefile renderer but I don't want
> to hold you up if you need the release. Although I expect my changes
> will be done by the end of the week. I have not ETA for when I need
> 2.2.3 feel free to do what you need.
Oh, I don't h
Ciao guys,
I have read the document myself and I have a few
remarks/thoughts/corrections myself:
-> http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/JGRASS/raster (GRASS
raster format section)
I would rephrase the solutions proposed by uDig (who's this guy? :-) )
PROBLEM:
Consuming JGrass Bin
I'm currently doing some work on the Shapefile renderer but I don't
want to hold you up if you need the release. Although I expect my
changes will be done by the end of the week. I have not ETA for when
I need 2.2.3 feel free to do what you need.
Jesse
On 5-Feb-07, at 8:00 AM, Andrea Ai
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>>> Andrea can I have a "upgrade to 2.3" instruction for this please" :-)
>>>
>>> We did not go through a geotools proposal on this one (it is an API
>>> change is it not?); is their a Jira that will show up in the
>>> chang
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> Andrea can I have a "upgrade to 2.3" instruction for this please" :-)
>>
>> We did not go through a geotools proposal on this one (it is an API
>> change is it not?); is their a Jira that will show up in the
>> change notes at least?
> API change? W
Hello!
We are going to implement several bulk spatial operations needed in one
project.
May be there is existing implementation of algorithms using JTS
functionality (for binary spatial operations) and GeoTools stuff to
manipulate features.
1) Division of the layer with a set of polygonal featur
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Converting GeoServer to entirely work against the geoapi filter and
> expression interfaces, I have found a bit of wrinkle. Changing calls from:
>
> FactoryRegistry.lookupProvider( FunctionExpression.class )
>
> to :
>
> FactoryRegistry.lookupProvider( Fu
Hi all,
I'm wondering what timeframe uDig 1.1.0 has, since I
guess you'll want a 2.2.3 release, something which
would be good to use as a base Geoserver 1.4.1.
We don't have a release date for 1.4.1, but it's definitely
a release I would like to get out for people that are
not interested in WCS, no
Hi,
today I noticed this page, which hosts quite a number of
rendering hints I was not aware of:
http://java.sun.com/developer/JDCTechTips/2004/tt0518.html
I'm wondering, did anyone tried them (besides the antialias
ones) and can comment on speed/quality differences?
I know antialias significantly
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
> Hi all,
> I'm trying to import the other configurations into svn, making them
> proper data dirs, and have them usable both inside the geoserver war
> and as external data dirs at the same time.
... bah, confused mailing lists as usual :-(
Sorry to the spam.
Cheers
Andrea
Hi all,
I'm trying to import the other configurations into svn, making them
proper data dirs, and have them usable both inside the geoserver war
and as external data dirs at the same time.
The document at
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOSDOC/GeoServer+Data+Directory
wants a flat directory lay
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Andrea can I have a "upgrade to 2.3" instruction for this please" :-)
>
> We did not go through a geotools proposal on this one (it is an API
> change is it not?); is their a Jira that will show up in the
> change notes at least?
API change? Well, no new classes, no ne
20 matches
Mail list logo
