Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> You are correct - the whole adding Features and assigning Fids workflow
> is messed up. See GeoAPI for a more realistic workflow that we have not
> had time to implement. Basically we should not return the "Set" until
> *commit* is called (since some added features may
Jody Garnett wrote:
> Second question ... did we manage to deploy our source code as well as
> our jars?
Yes (geoapi and geotools), since src jars are still turned on by
default. When we disable this, we will have to amend the release
documentation to explain how to turn them back on (profile?
Second question ... did we manage to deploy our source code as well as
our jars?
Jody
> This month's milestone release, 2.4-M3, is available for download:
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2.4-M3
>
> Cheers,
> Cory.
>
> -
Jody Garnett wrote:
> The README looks way better this month - did someone fix it or did you
> do it by hand?
ye trusty text editor
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of
Thanks ZZorn:
I asked after your svn access ... apparently we are screwing up a bit. I
should of sent the request - in effect nominating you for commit access
as per the normal developer guide procedures.
- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/2+Committers
I sent the list of expected students
The README looks way better this month - did someone fix it or did you
do it by hand?
Thanks Cory !
> This month's milestone release, 2.4-M3, is available for download:
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2.4-M3
>
> Cheers,
> Cory.
>
> ---
Located here:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/IDEA+Project+File+Generation+with+Maven
(basically mvn idea:idea -DjdkName=1.4 should do it).
-- Hans
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Expres
This month's milestone release, 2.4-M3, is available for download:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2.4-M3
Cheers,
Cory.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of D
Hold on a second .. I have an email somewhere from that user and Frank.
Apparently the problem ended up being on the proj side.
Hi FrankW we are trying to sort out that "off by a bit" reprojection
between GeoTools and Proj that was reported a couple of months ago.
Cheers,
Jody
> Actually if the
I actually think the GeoAPI javadocs for this function are clear. They
make sense to me, taken directly from the ISO 19107 specs, and I'm not
sure what could be written differently to describe the same thing.
I think the original implementation just ignored these docs by accident
or perhaps th
You are correct - the whole adding Features and assigning Fids workflow
is messed up. See GeoAPI for a more realistic workflow that we have not
had time to implement. Basically we should not return the "Set" until
*commit* is called (since some added features may be removed by later
operations
Bleck - looks like a "simple" mistake. We should check that the GeoAPI
javadocs are *clear* so nobody else makes the same mistake.
Jody
> It looks like the getDimension() implementation is either incorrect or
> not implemented in many cases throughout this module. It is meant to
> return the d
On 5/31/07, Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ian Turton ha scritto:
> On 5/31/07, Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I'm a little dubious about a detail in point symbolizers.
>> What should the code do when both the symbolizers elements,
>> and the mark have an opacity de
ensure you meet the standard set for the release:
-
Key: GEOT-1284
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1284
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components: ext mappane
Create a Module Matrix page
---
Key: GEOT-1285
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1285
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Ian Turton
* show project status
* list jira issues
gold star check
---
Key: GEOT-1283
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1283
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components: ext mappane
Reporter: Ian Turton
Assignee: Ian Turton
Ian Turton ha scritto:
> On 5/31/07, Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I'm a little dubious about a detail in point symbolizers.
>> What should the code do when both the symbolizers elements,
>> and the mark have an opacity declard?
>> Point symbolizers has opacity, mark has the
It looks like the getDimension() implementation is either incorrect or
not implemented in many cases throughout this module. It is meant to
return the dimension of the geometry object, but for instance in
MultiPrimtiveImpl it returns the dimension of the coordinate reference
system. The ISO 1
On 5/31/07, Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm a little dubious about a detail in point symbolizers.
> What should the code do when both the symbolizers elements,
> and the mark have an opacity declard?
> Point symbolizers has opacity, mark has the css parameter
> fill-opacity.
Hi Andrea.
I followed the steps and now I'm waiting geotools approval :)
Thank you.
Best regards,
Daniele
On 5/31/07, Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Daniele Romagnoli ha scritto:
> Hi Andrea.
>
> My user id is dany111
>
> Thank you for the help. (Sorry for the double post)
Hi Daniele
Christophe Rousson wrote:
> I added a wiki page for my SoC project :
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/SoC+2007+Caching+data
:) glad to see it...
May I suggest a requirement?
uDig's biggest motivation for this feature is to be able to disconnect
the uDig client from the world and s
Hi,
looking at the transaction code in Geoserver I found a
comment that prompted me to look at the WFS specification
about how inserted feature fids are returned.
The specification states:
The element contains one or more feature identifiers of
newly created feature instances. One element is re
Hi all,
I'm a little dubious about a detail in point symbolizers.
What should the code do when both the symbolizers elements,
and the mark have an opacity declard?
Point symbolizers has opacity, mark has the css parameter
fill-opacity.
At the moment the streaming renderer code ignores the
main opac
Daniele Romagnoli ha scritto:
> Hi Andrea.
>
> My user id is dany111
>
> Thank you for the help. (Sorry for the double post)
Hi Daniele,
log in into xircles, go to Projects, find geotools,
click on the project title to see details, and then
"apply as a developer". Ping us when you're done with i
That sounds about right. I guess the EdgeRing code needs looking at
then. It ends up creating and storing a RingImpl, when we should
probably be storing just an ArrayList of points like you suggest.
I'll take a deeper look at this, but the problem now may be if we need
to split up this list o
Hi Andrea.
My user id is dany111
Thank you for the help. (Sorry for the double post)
Best Regards,
Daniele
On 5/31/07, Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Daniele Romagnoli ha scritto:
> Hi list.
> Today I talked with my mentor (Simone Giannecchini) about some topics
> related to my SOC w
Daniele Romagnoli ha scritto:
> Hi list.
> Today I talked with my mentor (Simone Giannecchini) about some topics
> related to my SOC work.
> I would like to add the LOG of our conversation (containing Simone's
> suggestions and explainations) into a wiki page.
>
> I tried to logging here:
> htt
Hi list.
Today I talked with my mentor (Simone Giannecchini) about some topics
related to my SOC work.
I would like to add the LOG of our conversation (containing Simone's
suggestions and explainations) into a wiki page.
I tried to logging here:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Plugins+f
Christophe Rousson ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I added a wiki page for my SoC project :
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/SoC+2007+Caching+data
>
> Many ideas come from Andrea's :
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Datastore+caching
>
> Cheers,
Hi Christophe,
the plan is a bi
Actually if the user's bug report is based on visual mismatch between two
layers, and if a layer was projected with Proj4 (for example through a PostGIS
database), it would be worth to ask which Proj version was used. According the
test you did and mine, it sound like that Proj 4.4.6 and Proj 4.4.9
Hello Andrea
Andrea Aime a écrit :
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-1037#action_97689
>
> I would let him 1-2 days for answering back, and the close
Thanks. I can wait to next week; there is no rush after all and maybe I missed
some point.
Martin
---
Hi,
I added a wiki page for my SoC project :
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/SoC+2007+Caching+data
Many ideas come from Andrea's :
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Datastore+caching
Cheers,
Christophe
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> Hello Andrea
>
> I just spent half a day trying to investigate this issue, and I wonder if it
> should be closed as "not a bug". Could you please take a look at the comment I
> added there if you have a chance?
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-1037#action
Hello Andrea
I just spent half a day trying to investigate this issue, and I wonder if it
should be closed as "not a bug". Could you please take a look at the comment I
added there if you have a chance?
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-1037#action_97689
Martin
--
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/1/buildId/799
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and t
35 matches
Mail list logo
