[Geotools-devel] CQL++ = TXT

2008-01-08 Thread Jody Garnett
How do you guys feel about making a language that is a bit more lax? Now that we have the starting point? I am thinking specifically of making one that has: a) support for filters that match what geotools can do: CQL: propertName contains geometry TXT: geometry contains propertyName b) some kind

Re: [Geotools-devel] complex datastore vs GEOT-1655

2008-01-08 Thread Gabriel Roldán
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 06:35:23 pm Jody Garnett wrote: > So If I understand the comments we need to change the expression to use > single quotes? The problem is just that the expression was invalid? Indeed, though it was supported on a previous version of the CQL module, its true the language

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-1658) Resolve the charcter string rule consistently whit the CQL BNF

2008-01-08 Thread Mauricio Pazos (JIRA)
Resolve the charcter string rule consistently whit the CQL BNF Key: GEOT-1658 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1658 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Improvement

Re: [Geotools-devel] time to updgrade?

2008-01-08 Thread Jody Garnett
I am not sure there is any benefit unless you rewrite seconds of the code to make use of JTS 1.9 facilities. Read over the change list and see if you care: - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2008/01/08/Upgraded+to+JTS+1.9 Jody > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> Gabriel Roldán wrote: >>> JTS-

Re: [Geotools-devel] time to updgrade?

2008-01-08 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Gabriel Roldán wrote: >> JTS-1.9 was released last week. Our trunk refers to RC6. Time for an upgrade? >> > Understood; I will download and deploy :-) Wondering, shall we move 2.4.x to jts 1.9 once 2.4.0 is released? Cheers Andrea

Re: [Geotools-devel] complex datastore vs GEOT-1655

2008-01-08 Thread Jody Garnett
Understood; mark the bug as "wont fix" and stick to your guns. You can be a decisive module maintainer (and stick to your guns) on this one. Cheers, Jody > Yes, I think double quote in string will be a source of mistakes. Moreover > the language provide a definition for string literal, I guess w

Re: [Geotools-devel] complex datastore vs GEOT-1655

2008-01-08 Thread Mauricio Pazos
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Jody Garnett wrote: > So If I understand the comments we need to change the expression to use > single quotes? Right. > The problem is just that the expression was invalid? Yes, I think double quote in string will be a source of mistakes. Moreover the language provi

Re: [Geotools-devel] time to updgrade?

2008-01-08 Thread Jody Garnett
Gabriel Roldán wrote: > JTS-1.9 was released last week. Our trunk refers to RC6. Time for an upgrade? > Understood; I will download and deploy :-) done. Going to let my build finish before committing the change to the root pom. Gabriel you will find the begining of JTS documentation (and

Re: [Geotools-devel] complex datastore vs GEOT-1655

2008-01-08 Thread Jody Garnett
So If I understand the comments we need to change the expression to use single quotes? The problem is just that the expression was invalid? Mauricio Pazos wrote: > Today I analyze the bug, please see the comments in > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1655 > > I am copying this mail to And

[Geotools-devel] time to updgrade?

2008-01-08 Thread Gabriel Roldán
JTS-1.9 was released last week. Our trunk refers to RC6. Time for an upgrade? Gabriel -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: [jts-devel] JTS 1.9 Released Date: Thursday 03 January 2008 From: Martin Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: JTS Topology Suite Development <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> JTS

Re: [Geotools-devel] complex datastore vs GEOT-1655

2008-01-08 Thread Mauricio Pazos
On Friday 04 January 2008, Mauricio Pazos wrote: > On Friday 04 January 2008, Jody Garnett wrote: > > How about it Mauricio? There does not seem to be anything wrong with the > > > > expression: > > > strConcat( strConcat(QS, strConcat("/", RT)), strConcat(strConcat("/", > > > NUMB), strConcat("/",

Re: [Geotools-devel] Simple questions on CRS and Envelopes

2008-01-08 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Simone Giannecchini a écrit : > for the moment I will try to leave with the 3D limitation we have. In > case it becomes too hard to live with it I will try to spare some time > for helping to finish the referencing3D work. Thanks. I forget to said that this 3D-Geographic special case is not a weir