Ciao Martin,
as a consequence of Monday's IRC meeting I have started to do some
minor refactor for the raster symbolizer work, you can check here
http://svn.geotools.org/geotools/branches/2.4.x_rs/modules/library/render/src/main/java/org/geotools/referencing/piecewise/
What I am trying to achieve
Jody,
Openlayers recently had a similar discussion.
I strongly suggest that a license should be required for unsupported
modules too.
At some point, someone is likely to want to build upon unsupported
modules and move it from unsupported to supported and this process will
be much easier if you
Hi Matthias, let me try to answer as much as I can, though certainly can't
answer all your questions...
On Tuesday 26 February 2008 07:11:01 pm Matthias Basler wrote:
> Hi GeoTools developers,
>
> today I checked the page http://geotools.codehaus.org/2.5.x
that's strange. The authoritative url sh
Hi GeoTools developers,
today I checked the page http://geotools.codehaus.org/2.5.x
(on which I arrived via www.geotools.org) and tried to check the status of
Geotools 2.5 releases.
First thing I noted is that all the "Resources" links don't work,
such as f.e.
http://geotools.codehaus.org/displa
ah right I'd forgotten about that. Its been a little while since I
read the doc.
Thanks
Le 26-Feb-08 à 9:06 AM, Adrian Custer a écrit :
> I don't want it, do I?
>
> I hope it says on the first page that you should send it to that
> address, right?
>
> --adrian
>
> On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 09:01 -
I don't want it, do I?
I hope it says on the first page that you should send it to that
address, right?
--adrian
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 09:01 -0800, Jesse Eichar wrote:
> Hey adrian how do I get this document to you?
>
> Jesse
>
> Le 25-Feb-08 à 2:26 PM, Adrian Custer a écrit :
>
> > Hey Jody,
Hey adrian how do I get this document to you?
Jesse
Le 25-Feb-08 à 2:26 PM, Adrian Custer a écrit :
> Hey Jody,
>
> I realize you've been crazy busy and continent hoping so sorry to harp
> on your over stressed self. I'm wondering for an update from you on
> where we stand.
>
>
> We are starting
Backport the ArcSDE improvements in trunk to 2.4.x
--
Key: GEOT-1719
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1719
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Task
Components: data arcsde
Affe
Allow ArcSDEDataStore to edit the default version when a sde featureclass is
versioned
--
Key: GEOT-1718
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1718
Project: GeoTo
Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
> Anyways, not trying to come across as negative Martin. I am +1 on
> introducing some sensible guidelines for subclassing. But lets do it for
> the right reasons.
Actually my intend was not to introduce any policy. The only purpose of my
email
was to provide a back
ShapefileDataStore not working with extension less files
Key: GEOT-1717
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1717
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: data shap
11 matches
Mail list logo
