Re: [Geotools-devel] RasterSymbolizer: leave room for contouring/windbarbs

2008-02-28 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey Bryce, The proposal has changed dramatically following last monday's IRC. It turns out what Alessio/Simone, needed was indeed a MathTransform rather than a duplicate category system. If I understood correctly, their symbolizer work needs a piecewise, 1D transform from the image data set valu

[Geotools-devel] New Email

2008-02-28 Thread Jesse Eichar
Hi All, I'm no longer working for Refractions Research Inc. and as a result my email addresses have changed. You can contact me from now on at this address. I'm going to be pretty hard to reach for the next couple of weeks as I relocate but I'll do my best to at least read my email even

Re: [Geotools-devel] Can we freeze commits on 2.4.x?

2008-02-28 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Andrea Aime wrote: > I think nobody besides TOPP is actively developing on > 2.4.x anyways these days? Rob Atkinson and I are developing in 2.4.x modules/unsupported/community-schemas. But this should not affect a core release. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Software Engineer, CSIRO

[Geotools-devel] RasterSymbolizer: leave room for contouring/windbarbs

2008-02-28 Thread Bryce L Nordgren
Comments based solely on the wiki page and Monday's IRC. I think this proposal is going to add quite a bit of power to the downstream code (e.g. GeoServer). I confess I have trouble understanding what a "Category" is from the picture. Are these types of transforms? I like that SLD provided a "

[Geotools-devel] svn is back

2008-02-28 Thread Jody Garnett
svn is back. > seems the machine we rent is down pretty hard; we are on the phone with > them now ... so Martin today would be a good day to look at the svn > clean up :-) > > - > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft

[Geotools-devel] GeoServer 1.6.1 and GeoTools 2.4.1 good to go

2008-02-28 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, so the remaining issues in the WCS test suite turned out to be an issue with the old WCS test suite, and we never stumbled upon it because it's in the update sequence tests (first release we do have update sequence support in wcs). OGC people say that the issue is fixed in the new WCS 1.0 test

Re: [Geotools-devel] Getting the 2d equivalent portion of a 3d Crs

2008-02-28 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey Jody, Martin's gone to bed so here's an interim, re-explanation of what he explained to me earlier today. All 3D, other than ellipsoidal 3D, are compound 2D+1, a vertical. To turn those into 2D you can simply throw out the vertical axis. (Okay, that's not pedantically what you want to do in

[Geotools-devel] svn not coming back soon

2008-02-28 Thread Jody Garnett
seems the machine we rent is down pretty hard; we are on the phone with them now ... so Martin today would be a good day to look at the svn clean up :-) - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Mic

Re: [Geotools-devel] Getting the 2d equivalent portion of a 3d Crs

2008-02-28 Thread Jody Garnett
Andrea Aime wrote: >> We have: >> >> CRS.getHorizontalCRS(3d); >> >> which tries to extract the horizontal part - this is not necessarly >> the 2 first dimensions, it could be anywhere in a n-D CRS. It should >> work for every kind of vertical height except ellipsoidal... In other >> words it

Re: [Geotools-devel] Getting the 2d equivalent portion of a 3d Crs

2008-02-28 Thread Jody Garnett
So Martin I am stuck on this one - what should I do? If you explain the problem well enough I do not mind trying my hand at an implementation. As I understand it any CRS with more than two axis is fatal right now? Jody > Andrea Aime a écrit : >> Martin, how hard would it be to make that method w

Re: [Geotools-devel] SVN down: new reasons

2008-02-28 Thread Jody Garnett
Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Arne Kepp a écrit : > >> Maybe a bit untimely, but I recommend using the fsfs backend rather than >> Berkeley DB: >> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.4/svn-book.html#svn.reposadmin.basics.backends >> >> > Yes I fully agree... Unfortunatly for administrative

[Geotools-devel] Can we freeze commits on 2.4.x?

2008-02-28 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, I've run all cite tests for GeoServer and they are passing (besides the wcs 1.0 ones where the test engine itself is having problems). Can I ask people not to commit on 2.4.x for a few days, so that we can check wcs 1.0 as well, and then cut 2.4.1 and release GeoServer 1.6.1? I think nobody b

Re: [Geotools-devel] Getting the 2d equivalent portion of a 3d Crs

2008-02-28 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Andrea Aime a écrit : > Martin, how hard would it be to make that method work with ellipsoidal > height? Not really hard. At the difference of other cases, the 3D Ellipsoid case requires the instantation of new objects. We need to add in CRS.getHorizontalCRS(...) a special test for the Geograph

Re: [Geotools-devel] SVN down: new reasons

2008-02-28 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Arne Kepp a écrit : > Maybe a bit untimely, but I recommend using the fsfs backend rather than > Berkeley DB: > http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.4/svn-book.html#svn.reposadmin.basics.backends > Yes I fully agree... Unfortunatly for administrative reasons, the current SVN server is stick to an

Re: [Geotools-devel] Getting the 2d equivalent portion of a 3d Crs

2008-02-28 Thread Andrea Aime
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto: > Andrea Aime a écrit : >> as you may know, 4327 is 4326 evil brother, in that is >> has the ellipsoidal height as a third axis. >> >> Now, let's say somewhere in the code I want to flatten >> data and their CRS. Removing the z from the data is the >> easy part, how

Re: [Geotools-devel] SVN down: new reasons

2008-02-28 Thread Arne Kepp
Maybe a bit untimely, but I recommend using the fsfs backend rather than Berkeley DB: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.4/svn-book.html#svn.reposadmin.basics.backends -Arne Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Now the error message is different from everything I have seen previously: > > svn: Berke

Re: [Geotools-devel] Getting the 2d equivalent portion of a 3d Crs

2008-02-28 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Andrea Aime a écrit : > as you may know, 4327 is 4326 evil brother, in that is > has the ellipsoidal height as a third axis. > > Now, let's say somewhere in the code I want to flatten > data and their CRS. Removing the z from the data is the > easy part, how do I shave off the 3rd dimension > from

[Geotools-devel] SVN down: new reasons

2008-02-28 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Now the error message is different from everything I have seen previously: svn: Berkeley DB error while checkpointing after Berkeley DB transaction for filesystem /home/svn/repositories/geotools/db: No space left on device Where the device is the server's one, not my machine.

[Geotools-devel] Getting the 2d equivalent portion of a 3d Crs

2008-02-28 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, let's say I'm doing a: CoordinateReferenceSystem 3d = CRS.decode("EPSG:4327"); as you may know, 4327 is 4326 evil brother, in that is has the ellipsoidal height as a third axis. Now, let's say somewhere in the code I want to flatten data and their CRS. Removing the z from the data is the easy

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools svn down

2008-02-28 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, it seems http://svn.geotools.org/ is unreachable. Anyone able to bring it back? I wanted to make the 2.4.1 release today but... hem... no go without svn Cheers Andrea - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy a

[Geotools-devel] Hudson build is back to normal: geotools-trunk #301

2008-02-28 Thread jdeolive
See http://gridlock.openplans.org:8080/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/301/changes - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/d