See http://gridlock.openplans.org:8080/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/509/changes
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use p
Gabriel Roldán wrote:
> right, I assumed this was that class. You want it to be an interface though,
> and the default impl as a separate class with setters a'la DefaultQuery,
> right?
>
Nope; I would like it to be a class with everything "false" by default -
ie not supported; And a safe way
Hi Jody,
On Wednesday 23 April 2008 08:35:04 pm Jody Garnett wrote:
> Hi Gabriel, the proposal is clear and I have only minor feedback
> - getOffset()? really the catalog specification uses startPosition
> and maxRecords (see page 143 of 07-006r1).
we're reusing the concept of maxFeature
Jody Garnett wrote:
> - getOffset()? really the catalog specification uses startPosition
> and maxRecords (see page 143 of 07-006r1). Is the WFS specification
> actually going with offset or have we just not asked yet.
>
Talked to Andrea, WFS does not mentioned offfset or startPosition ye
Hi Gabriel, the proposal is clear and I have only minor feedback
- getOffset()? really the catalog specification uses startPosition
and maxRecords (see page 143 of 07-006r1). Is the WFS specification
actually going with offset or have we just not asked yet.
-The class QueryCapabilities h
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> I'm using them in production (through MosaicImageWriter) before I
> suggested those classes last Monday...
So you understand how Executor is isolating the implementor of Callable
from external influence; in order to have more flexibility and control
over what is goin
Jody Garnett a écrit :
> Hi Martin this is not proving an effective use of either of our time; I
> am not sure you understand the design of Executor/Callable/Future.
I'm using them in production (through MosaicImageWriter) before I suggested
those classes last Monday...
However I do not yet und
Hi PMC, hi all
As some of you already know, I am taking Andrea's place on the Feature Paging
proposal.
We have been debating for a couple weeks now about it both on IRC and mailing
list and would like to call for vote on it, at least someone has further
concerns. Yet, I'll beg you for a quick
See http://gridlock.openplans.org:8080/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/508/changes
Changes:
[afabiani] Just a bit optimization of SLDParser code
[afabiani] Preparing for Raster Symbolizer support porting ... still disabled
on StreamingRenderer though
--
[...tr
Error encoding ID Filter to XML
---
Key: GEOT-1782
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1782
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core filter
Environment: win2000, jre 1.6
10 matches
Mail list logo
