[Geotools-devel] ArcSDE state of play, some mistakes due to new feature model handling of Date converations

2008-04-25 Thread Jody Garnett
I have been a bit puzzled by some of the test failures, specifically FilterTest.testBBoxFilter. The two features being compared (and failing) are pretty much the same ... except for a Date comparison. The two dates look equal to the toString method; but on closer inspection they have different

[Geotools-devel] ArcSDE state of play

2008-04-25 Thread Jody Garnett
I finally have an ArcSDE of my own to run the tests against ... and a list of 19 failures. ArcSDEPyramidTest (2 failures) - testArcSDEPyramidFourBand() - can you supply a better example for the connection settings? The test cases asks for a "fourbandtable" property which is not supplied. Many

Re: [Geotools-devel] Process extends Callable

2008-04-25 Thread Jody Garnett
Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > So I assume that the interfaces would looks like that: > > public interface Process { > void process(ProgressListener listener); > > // Some input and output methods for parameters > } > > > Would it be appropriate to rename the other interfaces

Re: [Geotools-devel] Process extends Callable

2008-04-25 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Hello Jody With the example that you gave us yesterday (Callable being serialized toward an other nodes in a cluster), I understand now the importance of comunicating progress/cancelation through the Executor only. So I assume that the interfaces would looks like that: public interface P

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-1784) Fix to Mysql 2.2.x branch

2008-04-25 Thread Harry Bullen (JIRA)
Fix to Mysql 2.2.x branch - Key: GEOT-1784 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1784 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Harry Bullen Attachments: Mysql_2.2.x.patch This is a couple

Re: [Geotools-devel] Building error with new changes on GeoAPI

2008-04-25 Thread Cédric Briançon
Jody Garnett a écrit : > Martin Desruisseaux wrote: >> Thats fine for me. Maybe GeoTools doesn't need to be always >> compilable against the latest GeoAPI SVN, as long as it compiles >> against the latest snapshot deployed on the maven repository. >> > You are correct Martin; I was not even go