Justin you should have a different set of dependencies for Java 6; since
jaxb is starting to get folded into Java 6 you will get security / class
cast exception when trying to mix and match the same "class" between two
different classloaders... the JRE gets annoyed when you have classes in
your
Hi all,
I am running into problems with the jaxb module conflicting with the
version of jaxb that is depended on by the xml parser. The problem is i
get SecurityException complaining about JAXException:
java.lang.SecurityException: class "javax.xml.bind.JAXBException"'s
signer information does
Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
> Everytime I think I am close to understanding I get more confused. :]
> Jody wrote: "Are you sure you want to do this?"
>
Gak; don't mind me too much - I need to hack more and email less.
> Not after reading your last post to this thread...
>
> Whoa! I never thought a
Everytime I think I am close to understanding I get more confused. :]
Jody wrote: "Are you sure you want to do this?"
Not after reading your last post to this thread...
Jody wrote: "The reason I ask is the factory may be provided to you by
the end users; perhaps they have a specific implementati
Justin, I've got a quick test that shows the error we have for this:
geotools\trunk\modules\extension\xsd\wps\src\test\java\org\geotools\wps\ExecuteTest.java
Graham.
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hmmm.. this is not just an attribute, but an attribute with an anonymous
> type. Nasty. I have actual
That is also an option Andrea; any chance we can come up with unqiue
names for these two ideas? ie implement and document them as separate
functions...
> The first thing I need, is to change the generated rules so that they
> all use closed intervals, such as:
> 0 <= x <= 10
> 10 < x <= 20
> 20 <
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Well, since I have a customer that needs this, and there seems to be
> no agreement (or lack of interest) on what to do, I'll roll a custom
> variant of the quantile algorithm inside GeoServer that does what I
> suggested, set apart the flat areas of the histogram in their o
Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
> Jody,
>
> I need to follow up on my earlier question about a SimpleFeature
> implementation. I'm really looking for the object that I would create
> to represent a GPX entity like a waypoint as a SimpleFeature. So in
> some sense I'd actually be trying to implement Featu
You can find my experimental GPX code here:
http://surveyos.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/surveyos/java/gpx/src/
The code is documented or unit tested yet, and some of the methods are
stubs. I'm fooling around with some techniques for accessing and
managing GPX that are a little different from the o
Jody,
I need to follow up on my earlier question about a SimpleFeature
implementation. I'm really looking for the object that I would create
to represent a GPX entity like a waypoint as a SimpleFeature. So in
some sense I'd actually be trying to implement FeatureFactory.
Maybe it would make sense
This question is probably most appropriate for Peter.
I noticed in the GeoTools Javadoc that you supported the GPX
"extensions" element through the use of the ExtensionsType class:
http://javadoc.geotools.fr/2.5/org/geotools/gpx/bean/ExtensionsType.html
I'm working on a reader/write implementati
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Some years ago rendering tests were made against simple,
> manually verified exemplars, that is, generated images that
> were stored on disk and then compared pixel by pixel against
> the result of a test render operation. To put it in other words,
> it was checked that the ren
The GeoTools 2.4.3 release is available for download at:
http://geotools.codehaus.org/GEOTOOLS/2.4.3
This is a bug fix release and should be considered stable.
New features and notable bug fixes:
* Support for paged feature extraction out of PostGIS data store
and generic capabilities API to c
Theodor Foerster wrote:
> I am just trying to use gt 2.4.2. I am extensively making use of
> FCBuffer, when using gt 2.3. And I thought of doing this as well on the
> 2.4.2 version of gt. Unfortunately I get an error, which says, that
> GMLComplexTypes is looking for ExcludeFilter, which is not ava
Sure I'll hold off. If you are renaming the others, can you rename this
one as well and just do them all in one big commit? Thanks,
Graham.
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Can you hold off on committing? If you have a bunch of local mods then
> go ahead. But I would like to change the other artif
Hi,
I am just trying to use gt 2.4.2. I am extensively making use of
FCBuffer, when using gt 2.3. And I thought of doing this as well on the
2.4.2 version of gt. Unfortunately I get an error, which says, that
GMLComplexTypes is looking for ExcludeFilter, which is not available
(i.e ClassNotFoundExc
As a follow up,
if someone wants to try some nice MrSid data, here you go:
https://zulu.ssc.nasa.gov/mrsid/
https://zulu.ssc.nasa.gov/mrsid/tutorial/Landsat%20Tutorial-V1.html
http://rockyweb.cr.usgs.gov/outreach/nasa_zulu.html
Ciao,
Simone.
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Daniele Romagnoli
<
GeometryCoordinateSequenceTransformer transforms linear rings to open
linestrings
-
Key: GEOT-1830
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1830
Project: GeoTools
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Rahkonen Jukka
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have thousands of aerial photos archived in JPEG2000 format, Kakudu
> license and great interest in seeing the WMS performance obtained directly
> from jpeg2000. Until now we have not been satisfied with th
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime ha scritto:
> ...
>> Again, not very useful... it's telling you that at the 33% break there
>> is a 0, and by applying it, you'd get a class that ends with 0, and
>> another that starts with 0. Which is something the layman using
>> the application does not und
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
...
> Again, not very useful... it's telling you that at the 33% break there
> is a 0, and by applying it, you'd get a class that ends with 0, and
> another that starts with 0. Which is something the layman using
> the application does not understand, it does not make sense
I'll do what I can Andrea. But I can't give a solid time line so kill
the renderer and I'll port the handlers as I have time.
Jesse
On 22-May-08, at 10:12 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
> as some of you may know, since release 1.6.0 GeoServer uses
> shapefile renderer to render shapefiles, and
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
...
> Soc is already gone, we'd have to wait for next year.
> As a quick measure of distance, we could do the following. For each
> pixel, extract the R G B A components, make a difference, component
> by component, against the expected value, and sum up the absolute
> value
Ops sorry... Missing copy-and-pasted links. (Starting hating Windows Vista
:P)
Repeating mail with links.
Hi lists,
With this email we report some progresses on our work on ImageIO-EXT GDAL
geotools plugin. Main details are available at the wiki page: [1].
Br
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
> Rob Atkinson ha scritto:
...
> Yet, the visual comparison could be included in the release producers
> making sure we don't have busted releases like 2.4.3.
Typo: release procedures, not producers
Cheers
Andrea
--
Hi lists,
With this email we report some progresses on our work on ImageIO-EXT GDAL
geotools plugin. Main details are available at the wiki page: [1].
Briefly,
this module allows to extend the GeoTools coverage data access capabilities
by leveraging on the powerful GDAL Libraries via the ImageIO-E
Rob Atkinson ha scritto:
> One could create a index page of output artefacts, for a quick visual
> scan. The human brain is pretty good. If this index page included static
> "expected" samples it would be pretty quick to eyeball.
Hum... one of the major features we want out of a build is to
be h
Hi,
as some of you may know, since release 1.6.0 GeoServer uses
shapefile renderer to render shapefiles, and falls back
on streaming renderer to render any other vector data source.
This has been done because of the very good performance
of shapefile renderer... however, in the last months I had
t
Hi,
this is a mail I have been meaning to write for quite some time,
the 2.4.3 release issues give me enough reason to take the time
and dump my toughts on a mail.
GeoTools has quite a big problem, we have the rendering modules
(renderer and shapefile-renderer) that have some unit tests, but
none
Hi,
today a user reported a major bug in point rendering that sneaked in
due to a side effect of me fixing another point rendering bug:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-1942
As a result, most point based maps won't render properly using
the streaming renderer (shapefile renderer is unaffected,
StreamingRenderer does not properly render point symbolizers anymore
Key: GEOT-1829
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1829
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
31 matches
Mail list logo
