[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-1857) Geometryless not disposing

2008-06-17 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies (JIRA)
Geometryless not disposing -- Key: GEOT-1857 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1857 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug Components: data geometryless Affects Versions: 2.4.5 Reporter: B

Re: [Geotools-devel] Another SUN class in our code

2008-06-17 Thread Graham Davis
The ProgressTask.java implementation has now been updated and committed. Sorry that it took a day longer than expected. Graham. Graham Davis wrote: > Yah, we can make that change on Monday. I'll let you know when it's > done. Thanks, > > Graham. > > > Jody Garnett wrote: >> Thanks Adrian; ye

Re: [Geotools-devel] XSQNameBindingTest Failure

2008-06-17 Thread Ed Hill
I no longer have the XSQNameBindingTest Failure as of this morning after checking the SVN. Thanks for you help. I am still getting the errors in test3BandsByte_SLD and test4BandsUInt16_SLD in RasterSymbolizerTest.java. I have narrowed the error down to getTiles() call in testRasterSymbolizerH

[Geotools-devel] Upgrated GeoAPI trunk from JSR-108 to JSR-275

2008-06-17 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Upgrated GeoAPI trunk dependencies from JSR-108 to JSR-275. Note yet deployed on Maven repositories however. GeoTools trunk has *not* yet been updated (this work is in progress right now). Those who work on both SVN, do not update GeoAPI trunk for the next 24 hours. Reference: http://jira.code

Re: [Geotools-devel] PMC: Reminder: JSR-275 proposal

2008-06-17 Thread Simone Giannecchini
voted today. Simone. On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank's Martin; I managed to vote yesterday. >> >> Reminder >>> >>> >>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Switch+from+JSR-108+to+JSR-275+for+Units >>> >> >> I would like to start commiting tod

[Geotools-devel] PMC: Reminder: JSR-275 proposal

2008-06-17 Thread Jody Garnett
Thank's Martin; I managed to vote yesterday. > Reminder >> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Switch+from+JSR-108+to+JSR-275+for+Units >> > > I would like to start commiting today. Nobody objected when I asked for > permission 2 or 3 weeks ago. If nobody put a negative vote, I would li

Re: [Geotools-devel] ECW readme.txt info needs to make it into review.txt

2008-06-17 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi Adrian, we will work on the review.txt as well as on that information. Daniele On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Adrian Custer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Simone, > > During this morning's update I happened to notice > imageio-ext-gdal/src/.../coverageio/gdal/ecw/Readme.txt > since its p

[Geotools-devel] Reminder: JSR-275 proposal

2008-06-17 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Reminder: > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Switch+from+JSR-108+to+JSR-275+for+Units I would like to start commiting today. Nobody objected when I asked for permission 2 or 3 weeks ago. If nobody put a negative vote, I would like to start the commits in about 6 hours. Martin

[Geotools-devel] ECW readme.txt info needs to make it into review.txt

2008-06-17 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey Simone, During this morning's update I happened to notice imageio-ext-gdal/src/.../coverageio/gdal/ecw/Readme.txt since its properties were changing. Make sure that info makes it into your module's review.txt and explain how you worked around it to make your module compatible with the LGP