Re: [Geotools-devel] JMapPane improvements

2009-02-16 Thread Michael Bedward
2009/2/17 Ian Turton : > go for it :-) > Super :-) Jody, let me know about any specifics you'd like to see in the first cut. Otherwise, I'll start off with a general clean-up and refactoring of the existing JMapPane. I'll warn the user list before committing. cheers Michael --

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2341) Improve ImageWorker forceComponentColorModel support for 16 bits data

2009-02-16 Thread Simone Giannecchini (JIRA)
Improve ImageWorker forceComponentColorModel support for 16 bits data - Key: GEOT-2341 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2341 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Improveme

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2340) NPE in CRSEnvelope.toString()

2009-02-16 Thread Norman Fomferra (JIRA)
NPE in CRSEnvelope.toString() - Key: GEOT-2340 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2340 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug Components: ext wms Affects Versions: 2.5.3, 2.5.2 Reporter

Re: [Geotools-devel] JMapPane improvements

2009-02-16 Thread Ian Turton
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Hi Ian: > > I have been talking with Michael Bedward about improving JMapPane a bit; > you are the module maintainer on this one (last commit in 2007). Do you > mind if we hack away for a bit? My hope is that Michael will do the work > and I w

Re: [Geotools-devel] How to generate javadoc 2.5.x (and later?)

2009-02-16 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi Cedric, On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Cédric Briançon < [email protected]> wrote: > Daniele Romagnoli a écrit : > > Hi again, > > I have added a profile to fix the gt-imageio-ext-gdal dependency > > issue. That profile will be activated using the "gdal" property name > > when call

Re: [Geotools-devel] How to generate javadoc 2.5.x (and later?)

2009-02-16 Thread Cédric Briançon
Daniele Romagnoli a écrit : > Hi again, > I have added a profile to fix the gt-imageio-ext-gdal dependency > issue. That profile will be activated using the "gdal" property name > when calling maven. > Now plugins and coveragetools module will leverage on > gt-imageio-ext-gdal module adding -Dgd

Re: [Geotools-devel] Geotools modules deployment: are SNAPSHOT jars automatically deployed? What time period is adopted?

2009-02-16 Thread Andrea Aime
Daniele Romagnoli ha scritto: > Hi Andrea, > the OSGEO repo contains old version too (Lastly updated on 17 > december... Not sure whether they are deployed only on code changes or not). > Anyway, almost a month ago (on 18 january), I have asked to add the > OSGEO repository in the main pom (Since

Re: [Geotools-devel] Geotools modules deployment: are SNAPSHOT jars automatically deployed? What time period is adopted?

2009-02-16 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi Andrea, the OSGEO repo contains old version too (Lastly updated on 17 december... Not sure whether they are deployed only on code changes or not). Anyway, almost a month ago (on 18 january), I have asked to add the OSGEO repository in the main pom (Since I was deploying imageio-ext on it to be c

Re: [Geotools-devel] Geotools modules deployment: are SNAPSHOT jars automatically deployed? What time period is adopted?

2009-02-16 Thread Andrea Aime
Daniele Romagnoli ha scritto: > Hi list, > I have a question: > How much periodically 2.5-snapshot jars are usually deployed (on > refractions repo)? > Does Hudson automatically deploy somehow them? > I have noticed that the last deployment on refractions have been done on > 17-december for some

[Geotools-devel] Geotools modules deployment: are SNAPSHOT jars automatically deployed? What time period is adopted?

2009-02-16 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi list, I have a question: How much periodically 2.5-snapshot jars are usually deployed (on refractions repo)? Does Hudson automatically deploy somehow them? I have noticed that the last deployment on refractions have been done on 17-december for some modules. Therefore, some last fixes aren't ava

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2339) ImageWorker forceComponentColorModel optimization cause problem with grayscale indexed images

2009-02-16 Thread Simone Giannecchini (JIRA)
ImageWorker forceComponentColorModel optimization cause problem with grayscale indexed images - Key: GEOT-2339 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2339

Re: [Geotools-devel] How to generate javadoc 2.5.x (and later?)

2009-02-16 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi again, I have added a profile to fix the gt-imageio-ext-gdal dependency issue. That profile will be activated using the "gdal" property name when calling maven. Now plugins and coveragetools module will leverage on gt-imageio-ext-gdal module adding -Dgdal to the maven command. Otherwise, imagei

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geotools-gt2-users] question from off list

2009-02-16 Thread Andrea Aime
Milton Jonathan ha scritto: > Hello people > > Sorry for the fast coding! We just wanted to see something working to > give us a better idea. But it's definitely not meant to be kept as it > is, just to start the process for us (especially since we are no > SLD-experts). > > OK, so let's see i

Re: [Geotools-devel] How to generate javadoc 2.5.x (and later?)

2009-02-16 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi Cedric, thank you for the info. I'll add a profile to re-enable gt-imageio-ext-gdal dependency on request to fix this issue. Regards, Daniele On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Cédric Briançon < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Daniele, please see below, some more explanations. > > Dan

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geotools-gt2-users] question from off list

2009-02-16 Thread Milton Jonathan
Hello people Sorry for the fast coding! We just wanted to see something working to give us a better idea. But it's definitely not meant to be kept as it is, just to start the process for us (especially since we are no SLD-experts). OK, so let's see if I gather everything here: - Ideally, we sh

Re: [Geotools-devel] How to generate javadoc 2.5.x (and later?)

2009-02-16 Thread Cédric Briançon
Hi Daniele, please see below, some more explanations. Daniele Romagnoli a écrit : > Hi guys, > I have a question in order to help fixing issues with the Javadoc > generation involing imageio-ext-gdal module and coverage-tools. > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Adrian Custer

Re: [Geotools-devel] How to generate javadoc 2.5.x (and later?)

2009-02-16 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi guys, I have a question in order to help fixing issues with the Javadoc generation involing imageio-ext-gdal module and coverage-tools. On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Adrian Custer wrote: > Hey all, > > Cedric is back from too much snow, the poor boy, and too much skiing. > He's sharing wit

Re: [Geotools-devel] cascading WFS

2009-02-16 Thread Keane, Tim
Gabriel- I have been working on producing the requests and responses as you suggested. However, I am having a no luck getting ArcGIS Server's WFS to properly apply Filters to GetFeature requests. So for now I am going to back burner this. Thanks for your help. -Tim __

[Geotools-devel] How can I set sample data_type in a geotiff?

2009-02-16 Thread Pasquale Paola
Do you know how can i set the data_type in a geotiff? Please read the following messages, or this thread to know my problems. http://www.nabble.com/Udig-1.1.1-problems-to-read-sample-value-in-geotiff-16-bit-to21934226.html#a21934226 http://www.nabble.com/Udig-1.1.1-problems-to-read-sample-value-in

[Geotools-devel] Geotools's dependencies: Licenses investigation WIKI page.

2009-02-16 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi Guys, I have made a WIKI page containing the actual state of the investigation on Geotools's dependencies Licensing based on the spreadsheet document you have gave to me. The page is available here: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Licenses+Investigation By my side, I'm adding informati

Re: [Geotools-devel] image / grid coverage maths function mapper

2009-02-16 Thread Michael Bedward
Ciao Andrea, I've done more work on the little language (working name is 'jiffle') to the point where it can now run some demo scripts and create output images. The source code is here: http://code.google.com/p/jai-tools/source/browse/#svn/trunk/jiffle I've done very little testing as yet so the