Re: [Geotools-devel] swing module status

2009-11-08 Thread Michael Bedward
Hi Jody, > With that in mind I would like to ask that the swing api be held in place by > working examples. This should have the same effect; user list acts as a > sanity check to catch regressions; and demo/example breaks when api changes. > Yep - that sums up what I said much more verbosely :)

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2822) Implement "biggest inscribed circle" labelling

2009-11-08 Thread Andrea Aime (JIRA)
Implement "biggest inscribed circle" labelling -- Key: GEOT-2822 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2822 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Improvement Components: core render Affec

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Win32 Hudson is back: thanks Arne!

2009-11-08 Thread Andrea Aime
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > > > Andrea Aime wrote: >> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >>> This is great! >>> >>> I notice the build is setup to build all the modules seperatly? Is >>> this intentional? Just curious. >> >> Eh... actually what you're seeing is the old Hudson I fear. >> The new o

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Win32 Hudson is back: thanks Arne!

2009-11-08 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Andrea Aime wrote: > Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >> This is great! >> >> I notice the build is setup to build all the modules seperatly? Is >> this intentional? Just curious. > > Eh... actually what you're seeing is the old Hudson I fear. > The new one is still being setup, I'll finish that t

Re: [Geotools-devel] FOSS4G 2009 code sprint: geometry transformations

2009-11-08 Thread Andrea Aime
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > Can you be more specific about what exactly kind of api has to change? I > think any additions are fine sicne I can't really see those interfaces > being implemented by client code. But any other changes would seem > strange after 2.6.0 has already been released.

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Win32 Hudson is back: thanks Arne!

2009-11-08 Thread Andrea Aime
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > This is great! > > I notice the build is setup to build all the modules seperatly? Is this > intentional? Just curious. Eh... actually what you're seeing is the old Hudson I fear. The new one is still being setup, I'll finish that tomorrow. As for the separate bu

Re: [Geotools-devel] FOSS4G 2009 code sprint: geometry transformations

2009-11-08 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Can you be more specific about what exactly kind of api has to change? I think any additions are fine sicne I can't really see those interfaces being implemented by client code. But any other changes would seem strange after 2.6.0 has already been released. Jody Garnett wrote: > The back port i

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Win32 Hudson is back: thanks Arne!

2009-11-08 Thread Justin Deoliveira
This is great! I notice the build is setup to build all the modules seperatly? Is this intentional? Just curious. Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi all, > as you might know some time ago we were forced to > disable the win32 Hudson build due to excessive resource > consumption (NTFS over the virtualized d

Re: [Geotools-devel] FOSS4G 2009 code sprint: geometry transformations

2009-11-08 Thread Jody Garnett
The back port is okay; the StyleFactory interface was set up with this "extension" in mind. Indeed I was trying to contact you about this one as 2.6.0 was going out ... Jody On 06/11/2009, at 9:35 PM, andrea aime wrote: > Hi, > during the first day of code sprint at FOSS4G 2009 > I sat down

Re: [Geotools-devel] swing module status

2009-11-08 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Michael: I tried recommending the swing module for graduation with the same line of reasoning previously (so I encourage this idea!). Test cases perform two things for us; sanity check to catch regressions and warning when api changes. With that in mind I would like to ask that the swing