Only thing I would add is Geometry parameters.
There is a common way to package up geometry provided by the WPS
implementations like 52N. It is basically a small schema that allows a single
geometry element to be passed in or out of a process.
Jim will know more.
Jody
On 11/06/2010, at 11:19
Andrea Aime wrote:
> In general, to allow a client to describe and handle all the inputs
> and output of the processes there has to be some agreement on what
> data types are supported and how to handle multiplicity.
And I forgot to deal with multiplicity.
First off, if a parameter is marked as o
Hi Andrea,
I am reading with interest this email, since I am nowadays extracting
all the JGrass processing power into a library that implements for
every module also the geotools process api.
My choice in the lib has been to rely on FeatureCollection and
GridCoverage2D, so I understand what you mea
Hi,
this week I've tried to make some of the processes in gt-process
run in GeoServer, as they presented some decent variety in input
and outputs. I succeded with some of them and found out a few
issues in the processes that the attached patch fixes.
The patch however does not contain only fixes
lim goh wrote:
> Speaking of NG, I see that the old stuffs are deprecated. Are they
> going to be removed ever? if yes, is there a schedule for the removal
> already?
We don't have a plan, but since we could not move the old postgis module
into unsupported in 2.6.x I guess a reasonable plan would
Speaking of NG, I see that the old stuffs are deprecated. Are they
going to be removed ever? if yes, is there a schedule for the removal
already?
2010/6/11 Andrea Aime :
> Евгений Лазарев wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> Can i implement
>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Next+Generation+JDBC+DataStor
Евгений Лазарев wrote:
> hi,
>
> Can i implement
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Next+Generation+JDBC+DataStore
> in svn it is in unsupported branch yet
> maybe this NG will be supported soon??
> or maybe i should implement old Architecture???
Lazarev, please keep the mails on the ge
I had a couple of questions today about the gt-process module and the use of
the Processors class. It is similar to DataStoreFinder; and if it makes things
easier we could call it ProcessFinder :-) It does do a little more then look up
factories and create Process instances; since it can also cr
Hi Jody,
Thanks for the branch. I've diff'd the changes into my local trunk
sources now. As an aside, I had the same problems doing that as I had
with your patches. Must be a shortcoming of svn diff.
I'm building it all now and will get back to you with comments.
Michael
--
