Re: [Geotools-devel] Unable to reproduce this build failure

2010-07-03 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> [exec] File >> "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Sphinx-0.6.1-py2.4.egg/sphinx/environment.py", >> line 537, in warn_and_replace >> [exec] linestart = error.object.rfind('\n', None, error.start) >> [exec] TypeError: slice indices must be integers or

[Geotools-devel] Hudson build is back to normal: geotools-trunk #2853

2010-07-03 Thread Hudson
See -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint

Re: [Geotools-devel] Unable to reproduce this build failure

2010-07-03 Thread Jody Garnett
Went through and removed all warnings; build seems to be restored. I suspect that a full clean is needed of the documentation if the structure changes at all. Links to javadocs still broken since the move to a new server. Jody On 04/07/2010, at 1:59 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > I am unable to re

[Geotools-devel] Unable to reproduce this build failure

2010-07-03 Thread Jody Garnett
I am unable to reproduce the current build failure; perhaps someone with more experienced in Sphinx can see what is wrong? Jody On 04/07/2010, at 4:25 AM, Hudson wrote: > [INFO] > > [INFO] Building Geotools Documentation >

[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-trunk #2852

2010-07-03 Thread Hudson
See Changes: [jive] crs lab -- [...truncated 11638 lines...] WARNING: Prefs file removed in background /home/tomcat/.java/.userPrefs/org/geotools/referencing/wkt/prefs.xml ---

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.7-M2

2010-07-03 Thread Jody Garnett
On 03/07/2010, at 7:26 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> Okay let me try this again; it seems that there is a fair amount of >> development slated for the 2.7 series that I was not aware of; and a release >> candidate is premature. I would still like to tag up a milestone rele

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.7-M2

2010-07-03 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Okay let me try this again; it seems that there is a fair amount of > development slated for the 2.7 series that I was not aware of; and a release > candidate is premature. I would still like to tag up a milestone release at > this time. > > As such can I request a 2.

[Geotools-devel] 2.7-M2

2010-07-03 Thread Jody Garnett
Okay let me try this again; it seems that there is a fair amount of development slated for the 2.7 series that I was not aware of; and a release candidate is premature. I would still like to tag up a milestone release at this time. As such can I request a 2.7-M2 release. It will probably take m

[Geotools-devel] spike cql

2010-07-03 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Mauricio: I see you have taken a copy of cql into the spike folder. I expect that is to look into the recent build issues on win32 and mac? Give me a shout if you would like to try a build on osx. Once again sorry for having to back out your changes; we could not manage to sort it out on th