[Geotools-devel] Hudson build is back to normal : geotools-trunk-docs #446

See -- Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! Dow

Re: [Geotools-devel] Literal guessing its type: a set of two patches to end this

Sounds good; did the change have the expected performance gain? Jody On 30/01/2011, at 1:45 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > so I've been trying to remove the type guessing code in > LiteralExpressionImpl.evaluate(object) and > came up with two little patches, one for gt2, one for geoserver, that

Re: [Geotools-devel] VolitileFunction

Looks good andrea; I am module maintainer on gt-opengis; so go ahead and commit when ready :-) Jody On 30/01/2011, at 5:02 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Justin Deoliveira > wrote: >> I don't think it requires a proposal since as you mention the impact is >> pretty

[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-trunk-docs #445

See Changes: [jdeolive] upgrading pom verions on trunk to 2.8-SNAPSHOT -- [...truncated 379 lines...] [INFO] Unable to find resource 'org.geotools:gt-process:jar:2.8-SNAPSHOT' in repos

[Geotools-devel] 2.7.x branch created

Hi all, Say hello to the 2.7.x branch. It has been created and the pom versions on trunk have been updated to 2.8-SNAPSHOT. -Justin -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. --

[Geotools-devel] help with sourceforge

Hi all, I have the release artifacts built but having issue with sourceforge. Apparently there was a global password reset a few days ago and everyone has to recover a new password. However my account is registered with an old email I no longer have access to. So I am sort of stuck. I have a requ

Re: [Geotools-devel] VolitileFunction

Perfect. Very nice. On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Justin Deoliveira > wrote: > > I don't think it requires a proposal since as you mention the impact is > > pretty small. I would just ask for a complete javadoc on the > > VolatileFunction

Re: [Geotools-devel] VolitileFunction

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > I don't think it requires a proposal since as you mention the impact is > pretty small. I would just ask for a complete javadoc on the > VolatileFunction interface explaining its role. Works for me. Let me try it out: --

[Geotools-devel] starting the 2.7-RC1 release train

Hi all, Just a heads up that I am starting the 2.7-RC1 release pretesting. If all goes well i hope to tag the release and branch 2.7.x in the next couple of hours. -Justin -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. --

Re: [Geotools-devel] VolitileFunction

I don't think it requires a proposal since as you mention the impact is pretty small. I would just ask for a complete javadoc on the VolatileFunction interface explaining its role. 2c. On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Jody Garnett > wrote:

[Geotools-devel] Literal guessing its type: a set of two patches to end this

Hi, so I've been trying to remove the type guessing code in LiteralExpressionImpl.evaluate(object) and came up with two little patches, one for gt2, one for geoserver, that put together make them both build. The gt one gets rids of the guessing game, fixed the only direct test against that game to

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3399) LiteralExpressionImpl.evaluate(x) should not try to guess the type of its content

LiteralExpressionImpl.evaluate(x) should not try to guess the type of its content - Key: GEOT-3399 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3399 Project: GeoTools

Re: [Geotools-devel] VolitileFunction

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Okay; let us get this one moving. > > I ambushed aaime on his weekend to see if this was slated for gt-api as a > simple patch; or if it would go through the proposal process. > > My initial thought was that this should be handled in a simil

[Geotools-devel] VolitileFunction

Okay; let us get this one moving. I ambushed aaime on his weekend to see if this was slated for gt-api as a simple patch; or if it would go through the proposal process. My initial thought was that this should be handled in a similar fashion to the other marker interface we have in there: > pu

[Geotools-devel] namespace work complete?

Hi Niels: I was checking the geotools proposals list; and saw your proposal still in place. I have moved it to 2.7.x (so it is slotted into the correct release). Could I ask you to update the proposal contents (who voted what; and what tasks were finished). http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEO