No objection. I was actually thinking about this today. Wierd!
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> I have noticed our pal Ian has been answering questions on:
> - http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/geotools
> - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/geotools
>
> I
I have noticed our pal Ian has been answering questions on:
- http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/geotools
- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/geotools
I like the model (relative to the user list) in that people search before
asking. Anything against me adding this as a referenc
Done; welcome to the project.
Wow that took weeks; hopefully you still remember where the patches are that
started this journey.
The hard part with patches is writing a test case if it was not included in the
patch.
--
Jody Garnett
On Tuesday, 22 February 2011 at 11:43 PM, Matthias Lendholt w
Hi PMC,
I've signed the contribution agreement (GeotoolsAssignmentToOSGeo.pdf)
and it's on the way via snail mail to OSGeo.
my osgeo id = lendholt
Cheers,
Matthias
Am 18.02.2011 22:51, schrieb Justin Deoliveira:
> +1 from me. Although hasn't Andrea been poking around in that module?
> Might b
Cool. Thanks Andrea.
I'm really pleased that you've done the SWT module for purely selfish
reasons :) Working out with you how to extract a common foundation
for the two modules will also make it much easier for me to inject
better design into the Swing module.
Michael
On 22 February 2011 19:4
