Yep; that is when I got frustrated and decided to document everything; even
with just a placeholder page :-)
The unsupported plugins are also listed against the "core" module they work
against; such as here:
- http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/library/data/index.html
One thing that is m
On 14 May 2011 20:00, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Go ahead with the page :-)
>
> What's the rationale behind having the results in the users guide?
>
Just so people can see what's there at a glance. Actually, Jody has
already done this page:
http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/unsupported/index.
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Michael Bedward
wrote:
> On 14 May 2011 18:52, Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Doh sorry, wrong mailing list. Though we could do something similar
>> for GeoTools as well?
>
> Yes please. I think it would be great.
>
> I can create the page if others like the idea. It woul
On 14 May 2011 18:52, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Doh sorry, wrong mailing list. Though we could do something similar
> for GeoTools as well?
Yes please. I think it would be great.
I can create the page if others like the idea. It would actually be
nice to have the final result in the user guide.
Mich
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> following the discussion about cleaning up the community modules I've
> put togheter this wiki page listing community modules along with
> whoever has still a stake in them and a column for comments:
>
> http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS
Hi,
following the discussion about cleaning up the community modules I've
put togheter this wiki page listing community modules along with
whoever has still a stake in them and a column for comments:
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/May+2011+Community+modules+cleanup
I've tried to merge in David
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Wondering, do you have a reproducable workload that can cause this?
> Like for example a jmeter test?
I think I've noticed a path that does not lead to full image chain
disposition: the case
in which there are multiple layers, one of which is
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Justin Deoliveira
> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> I have run into a situation in which a system is exhausting the limit on the
>> number of open files per process and I want to confirm my understanding of
>> why it i
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I have run into a situation in which a system is exhausting the limit on the
> number of open files per process and I want to confirm my understanding of
> why it is happening. Yes, the system is configured with the default on
