[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-trunk #3652

See Changes: [NielsCharlier] Joining Feature Chaining Issue Fix - GEOT-3593 -- [...truncated 14068 lines...] [INFO] [clean:clean {execution: default-clean}] [INFO] Deleting directory

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3615) Maven 3.0

Maven 3.0 - Key: GEOT-3615 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3615 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug Components: admin Affects Versions: 8.0-M1 Reporter: Jody Garnett Assignee: Jody Garnet

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3614) Docs include in build

Docs include in build - Key: GEOT-3614 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3614 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug Components: doc Affects Versions: 8.0-M1 Reporter: Jody Garnett The docs

Re: [Geotools-devel] Having fun implemeting sql function encoding for postgis

Sounds excellent, Andrea! Good work. On 29/05/11 17:06, Andrea Aime wrote: Hi, during the weekend I've been cooking a patch to implement sql encoding of some filter functions for PostGIS. I found out it's a really tricky business, harder than I thought it would have been. (warning, long mail) T

[Geotools-devel] Review of app-schema modules for promotion to extension

Jody, I have finished my clean up and I am ready for you to conduct your IP review of the app-schema modules as the last step needed for their promotion to extension. The modules to be reviewed are these: modules/unsupported/app-schema/app-schema modules/unsupported/app-schema/app-schema-resolv

Re: [Geotools-devel] Having fun implemeting sql function encoding for postgis

Wow, this all looks great Andrea. I don't really have much to add, the patch looks pretty complete to me and all the design choices you made make sense to me. Some random comments inline. On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > during the weekend I've been cooking a patch to i

Re: [Geotools-devel] labelling obstacles

Hi Andrea, I just updated the patch for this issue based on your feedback. Some additional comments inline. On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Justin Deoliveira > wrote: > > Right. So barring a better algorithm it would seem our choices are: >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Project Conventions: Recommend TPTP instead of Eclipse Profiler Plug-In?

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Kenneth Gulbrandsoy wrote: >> Maybe change the reference to TPTP with a warning on profiling big apps? > > Or mention both, adding warnings to both of them? Sure, that works too Cheers Andrea -- --- Ing. And

Re: [Geotools-devel] Project Conventions: Recommend TPTP instead of Eclipse Profiler Plug-In?

2011/5/30 Andrea Aime > > None in particular, I agree we should prefer linking a plugin that is > maintained > instead of a dead one. > At the same time, I cannot really recommend TPTP because it never proved > useful > to me :-p Sure :-) > Maybe change the reference to TPTP with a warning on

Re: [Geotools-devel] Project Conventions: Recommend TPTP instead of Eclipse Profiler Plug-In?

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Kenneth Gulbrandsoy wrote: > Good point. I've not hit this problem yet. Still learing how to use TPTP, so > I'm a bit blank on all the idiosyncrasies of TPTP :-) > Any other thoughts about Eclipse Profiler Plug-in vs TPTP? None in particular, I agree we should pr

Re: [Geotools-devel] Project Conventions: Recommend TPTP instead of Eclipse Profiler Plug-In?

Comments inline :-) 2011/5/30 Andrea Aime > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Kenneth Gulbrandsoy > wrote: > > Hi Jody and Michael / list! > > I see in the project conventions that the Eclipse Profiler Plug-In is the > > recommended Eclipse profiling tool. Is this still valid? The development >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Project Conventions: Recommend TPTP instead of Eclipse Profiler Plug-In?

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Kenneth Gulbrandsoy wrote: > Hi Jody and Michael / list! > I see in the project conventions that the Eclipse Profiler Plug-In is the > recommended Eclipse profiling tool. Is this still valid? The development is > stopped, and they recommend the use of TPTP instead

Re: [Geotools-devel] Project Conventions: Recommend TPTP instead of Eclipse Profiler Plug-In?

Understood. My point is, should we recommend something that is no longer in active development? Cheers, Kenneth 2011/5/30 Michael Bedward > Not sure about the project convention but I use the profiler in > NetBeans (although not enough as is obvious from my code :) > > Michael > > On 30 May 201

Re: [Geotools-devel] Project Conventions: Recommend TPTP instead of Eclipse Profiler Plug-In?

Not sure about the project convention but I use the profiler in NetBeans (although not enough as is obvious from my code :) Michael On 30 May 2011 18:20, Kenneth Gulbrandsoy wrote: > Hi Jody and Michael / list! > I see in the project conventions that the Eclipse Profiler Plug-In is the > recomme

[Geotools-devel] Project Conventions: Recommend TPTP instead of Eclipse Profiler Plug-In?

Hi Jody and Michael / list! I see in the project conventions that the Eclipse Profiler Plug-In is the recommended Eclipse profiling tool. Is this still valid? Th